[FieldTrip] oscillations in the intracranial vs. EEG/MEG

[Christos Papadelis]

From a signal processing point of view, there are both signals....

Christos

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 1, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Daniel Sodan <daniel.sodan at gmail.com<mailto:daniel.sodan at gmail.com>> wrote:

EXTERNAL EMAIL – Use caution with any links or file attachments.

Dear list,

My question is not directly fieldtrip related, but I think that this might be a relevant forum:
I was told by a paper reviewer that the literature treat oscillations in the intracranial (e.g., human ECoG) vs. EEG/MEG data differently. Consequently, discussing the literature of the EEG in the context of the intracranial results is not too relevant.  I would say that the two main differences between two types of data: a) low sensitivity to high frequencies in the EEG/MEG; b) low spatial specificity in the EEG/MEG. But apart from that,  why these two types of data are or should be treated differently? If someone has relevant references on this theme, I will appreciate.

Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
fieldtrip mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.science.ru.nl_mailman_listinfo_fieldtrip&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=_ZbHWZyXYAsyADXeexaXrPBe62S9DT0Eg7zZVaihHOA&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1371_journal.pcbi.1002202&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=1ff1oVb2sFmWtct0tpyFX79p6FIzVNxo4bDdYeSJ_24&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20191001/ff04ec53/attachment.html>