<html>

<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

</head>

<body dir="auto">

From a signal processing point of view, there are both signals....

<div><br>

</div>

<div>Christos<br>

<br>

<div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>

<div dir="ltr"><br>

On Oct 1, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Daniel Sodan <<a href="mailto:daniel.sodan@gmail.com">daniel.sodan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>

<br>

</div>

<blockquote type="cite">

<div dir="ltr">

<div><b><font color="red">EXTERNAL EMAIL – Use caution with any links or file attachments.</font></b><br>

<br>

</div>

<div dir="ltr">Dear list,

<div><br>

</div>

<div>My question is not directly fieldtrip related, but I think that this might be a relevant forum:</div>

<div>I was told by a paper reviewer that the literature treat oscillations in the intracranial (e.g., human ECoG) vs. EEG/MEG data differently. Consequently, discussing the literature of the EEG in the context of the intracranial results is not too relevant. 

 I would say that the two main differences between two types of data: a) low sensitivity to high frequencies in the EEG/MEG; b) low spatial specificity in the EEG/MEG. But apart from that,  why these two types of data are or should be treated differently? If

 someone has relevant references on this theme, I will appreciate.</div>

<div><br>

</div>

<div>Thanks,</div>

<div>Daniel</div>

</div>

</div>

</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite">

<div dir="ltr"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>

<span>fieldtrip mailing list</span><br>

<span><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.science.ru.nl_mailman_listinfo_fieldtrip&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=_ZbHWZyXYAsyADXeexaXrPBe62S9DT0Eg7zZVaihHOA&e=">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.science.ru.nl_mailman_listinfo_fieldtrip&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=_ZbHWZyXYAsyADXeexaXrPBe62S9DT0Eg7zZVaihHOA&e=</a>

</span><br>

<span><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1371_journal.pcbi.1002202&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=1ff1oVb2sFmWtct0tpyFX79p6FIzVNxo4bDdYeSJ_24&e=">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1371_journal.pcbi.1002202&d=DwIGaQ&c=fHUKEfYp8ZKZp-Z4zyr9bVWzIvkODZPO4N8qkwj6HVY&r=7SbC5dxnPau5yltY2QplNc-vztlJxcy9CY1sPv7zBkVXWSzBQiTQV7EfhGEB9MEp&m=K5quo6WtEFmNDsZ_ariu1vbi_gC_3kM_w7ee-dTH6pM&s=1ff1oVb2sFmWtct0tpyFX79p6FIzVNxo4bDdYeSJ_24&e=</a>

</span><br>

</div>

</blockquote>

</div>

</body>

</html>