[FieldTrip] Problems with ft_prepare_headmodel
Tzvetan Popov
tzvetan.popov at uni-konstanz.de
Mon Jul 2 16:54:54 CEST 2018
Dear Uri,
the solution to the problem (mesh inflation) is outlined in this tutorial: http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/dipolefitting?s[]=natmeg&s[]=headmodel#procedure <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/dipolefitting?s%5B%5D=natmeg&s%5B%5D=headmodel#procedure>
Scroll down to the section "Construct the EEG volume conduction model"
<http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/dipolefitting?s[]=natmeg&s[]=headmodel#construct_the_eeg_volume_conduction_model>
Good luck,
tzvetan
> Am 02.07.2018 um 14:37 schrieb Uri Eduardo Ramírez Pasos <urieduardo at gmail.com>:
>
> Dear Fieldtrippers,
>
> I have followed the Salzburg tutorial (http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/salzburg <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/salzburg>) to conduct EEG source reconstruction, but it doesn't work with some subjects' segmented mri files (whether I use dipoli or bemcp), due to intersections between surfaces.
>
> What are the typical trouble-shooting steps for this situation? I tried using a lower number of vertices for the mesh ([800 800 600]), to no avail. Are there any guidelines for the number of vertices?
>
> The number of subjects in my study is limited, so I would be loathe to exclude any subject from the analysis.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Uri Ramirez
> University of Würzburg
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
> https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20180702/5225bfea/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list