[FieldTrip] Different way of calculating the covariance for LCM
jean-michel.badier at univmed.fr
Wed Mar 23 09:49:58 CET 2011
Le 22/03/11 12:37, Luisa Frei a écrit :
> I have used method 3 with fieldtrip. But I don't think there is an
> easy way, you'll have to create the concatenated dataset yourself and
> tweak some of the fields in your data structure.
I was going to do that waiting that there may be a hidden option in
Fieldltrip and wanted to make sure I was using the toolbox correctly.
> In my case it was better to use this method because I am only
> interested in a very short time window, if your time window is long
> enough, it's probably better to use the average method (check van Veen
> et al., 1997, if you haven't already done so).
Yes I am in such a situation where I have to pick up pieces of signal of
quite short duration. Yes I checked the paper from van Ven et al. and
others like Brookes et al 2008 for example.
Laboratoire de MagnétoEncéphaloGraphie
INSERM U751. Aix Marseille Université
33 (0)4 91 38 55 62
_jean-michel.badier at univmed.fr_ <mailto:jean-michel.badier at univmed.fr>
Service de Neurophysiologie Clinique. CHU Timone
264 Rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille-France
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fieldtrip