Failure of recognizing 32-bit NeuroScan data
r.oostenveld at FCDONDERS.RU.NL
Tue Apr 13 10:04:09 CEST 2010
thanks for the suggestion. I have made a bugzilla ticket for it (http://bugzilla.fcdonders.nl/show_bug.cgi?id=65
) and it will be fixed in a upcoming version.
On 9 Apr 2010, at 5:34, Dan Zhang wrote:
> I found another problem regarding my data following the above
> Although ft_preprocessing can work well with the 32-bit data with
> the manual
> input, ft_definetrial and ft_artifact_eog (and other reading related
> functions) are not compatible with the 32-bit NeuroScan processing.
> For example, in line 105 of ft_artifact_zvalue.m, the read_header()
> was evoked without the 'headerformat' parameter.
> There are several other places with the same problem, I listed what
> I can
> find below:
> line 50, trialfun_general.m - read_header(), check if headerformat
> is provided
> line 59, trialfun_general.m - read_event(), check if headerformat is
> line 105 & 1152, read_event.m - the reading of neuroscan data is
> based on a
> new parameter called eventformat, which is not connected to the
> line 149, ft_artifact_zvalue.m - check if headerformat and
> dataformat are
> line 661, read_data - if the field of dataformat already exists, do
> override it
> I cannot guarantee that all the places were found, but at least my
> data can
> be loaded correctly if the above places were fixed.
> The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users
> of the FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new
> ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html
> and http://www.ru.nl/neuroimaging/fieldtrip.
The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html and http://www.ru.nl/neuroimaging/fieldtrip.
More information about the fieldtrip