[FieldTrip] Granger Causality / MVAR modelling problem

[Velden, Daniel]

Dear Jan-Mathijs,

thanks for your reply. Also thank you for affirming my presumption. Adjusting the number (spatial resolution) of our source reconstructed data seems like a valuable approach.
A massive pairwise decomposition is of course something I will consider. But I feel like the misinterpretation of non-observed contributions from "third-party" sources to the bivariate model might be wide open for critics.

However, thanks you for your help.

I will let you know about my further process, if you want to.

Greetings and all the best,
Daniel

------------------------------------------------

Daniel van de Velden (M.Sc.) || PhD candidate
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
Klinik für Klinische Neurophysiologie
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Robert-Koch.Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen
Tel. 0551- 39-65106

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20190522/477793bb/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Schoffelen, J.M. (Jan Mathijs)" <jan.schoffelen at donders.ru.nl>
Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Granger Causality / MVAR modelling problem
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:55:42 +0000
Size: 24687
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20190522/477793bb/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
fieldtrip mailing list
https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202