[FieldTrip] many ICA components looking the same
Vitória Piai
v.piai.research at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 19:01:32 CET 2015
hi Steve,
Thanks, sounds like a very reasonable explanation.
I'm wondering whether I could use Arjen's correction for head movement
prior to ICA decomposition, but I can imagine there would be problems
with doing the regression first... I'll ask Arjen what he thinks and
post it here - if he doesn't see this before I see him again - but I'd
be curious to hear what you think as well.
Thanks a lot!
Vitoria
On 10/28/2015 11:31 PM, Stephen Politzer-Ahles wrote:
> Hello Vitoria,
>
> I'm not sure, but one of my guesses would be head movement. That is to
> say, if the participant moves her head an inch (for example) then the
> same type of activity is going to start appearing on different
> sensors, and if that movement isn't corrected for then you can indeed
> start seeing what looks like many copies of the same component. (If
> you've done EEG, this is the same thing that happens when, for
> example, you bring the same participant back for multiple sessions on
> separate days and concatenate the datasets together, but didn't put
> the cap on on exactly the same place each time.) Do you have marker
> measurements you can use to at least check how much the head was
> moving, and perhaps to correct for movements over the course of the
> session?
>
> Best,
> Steve
>
>
>
> ---
> Stephen Politzer-Ahles
> University of Oxford
> Language and Brain Lab, Faculty of Linguistics, Phonetics & Philology
> http://users.ox.ac.uk/~cpgl0080/ <http://users.ox.ac.uk/%7Ecpgl0080/>
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:44:26 -0700
> From: Vit?ria Piai <v.piai.research at gmail.com
> <mailto:v.piai.research at gmail.com>>
> To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip at science.ru.nl
> <mailto:fieldtrip at science.ru.nl>>
> Subject: [FieldTrip] many ICA components looking the same
> Message-ID: <5631961A.1050507 at gmail.com
> <mailto:5631961A.1050507 at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running ICA (cfg.method = 'runica') on CTF data with 274
> sensors. I
> was restricting my decomposition to 80 components at first, and it
> worked well for all previous patients.
> Somehow, for this particular patient, many of the components have
> similar topography (I'm only showing till 42 below but the similarity
> continues for more components). Has anyone ever seen this before?
> If I look at the time course of these components, not all of them are
> clear eye-movements, but according to the topography, you'd think
> they are.
> Any thoughts, like either changing the method or rejecting only those
> components whose time courses clearly indicate eye movements and keep
> other components despite their topographies?
>
> Thanks,
> Vitoria
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20151028/bd0a6b81/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: jcbdeahi.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 164624 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20151028/bd0a6b81/attachment.png>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl <mailto:fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl>
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
> End of fieldtrip Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28
> *****************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20151029/c6bc60bb/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list