[FieldTrip] Single trial baseline correction issues

Jennifer Tellett lpxjrt at nottingham.ac.uk
Wed Jul 22 09:43:51 CEST 2015


Hi Agatha,

Thanks for the paper, I had seen that previously and was planning on looking at full epoch single trial baseline correction. However, I am not clear on how such a technique would be implemented using FieldTrip given the difficulties I was having regarding maintaining the single trial information in the structure of the output from ft_freqbaseline. Is this kind of thing possible in FieldTrip or will it require custom coding?

Thanks,
Jenny
________________________________________
From: Agatha Lenartowicz [alenarto at g.ucla.edu]
Sent: 21 July 2015 16:07
To: Tellett Jennifer
Cc: fieldtrip at science.ru.nl
Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Single trial baseline correction issues

Jennifer. There's an interesting paper out by Arno Delorme on this topic. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994498

Take a look. Agatha On Jul 21, 2015 7:28 AM, Jennifer Tellett <lpxjrt at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am relatively new to FieldTrip. I am intending on correlating frontal theta with occipital alpha at single electrode sites on a trial by trial basis for each subject, and as such I was hoping to apply baseline correction at the single trial level as opposed to to the grand average. However, in order to justify the use of the electrode sites, I first created a grand average and did the baseline correction on this. I wanted to check what differences it might make to the grand average if I instead baseline correct each trial, and then compute the grand average instead. However, when I implement ft_freqbaseline, although the dimord still suggests the structure is rpt_chan_freq_time, I no longer have the cumtapcnt variable and if I try to use cfg.avgoverrpts it tells me there are no repeats (trials). This means that (as far as I can see!) I seem to have lost the single trial information in conducting the baseline correction. In addition, because the dimord structure has 'rpt', it won't allow me to use ft_freqgrandaverage on the resulting data.
>
> What I'd ideally like is to know what is the best way of implementing baseline correction on a trial-by-trial basis, so that I retain the trial-by-trial information? Can I then create a grand average from these to check whether my justification for electrode choice still stands if baseline correction has been done per trial?
>
> Below are the settings I have used for each subject for frequency analysis and baseline correction, let me know if you need any more information.
>
>     % establish parameters for frquency analysis
>     cfg = [];
>     cfg.output = 'pow';         % chooses what output you want
>     cfg.channel={'all';'-LIO';'-LHE';'-RHE'};           % chooses which channels to output; all except EOG
>     cfg.method = 'mtmconvol';   % chooses type of frequency analysis to use
>     cfg.taper='hanning';        % chooses type of tapering to apply
>     cfg.foi=2.5:2.5:40;           % chooses frequencies of interest, currently looking between 2.5 and 40 Hz in steps of 2.5
>     cfg.t_ftimwin= ones(length(cfg.foi),1)*0.5;     % chooses time window of 500ms
>     cfg.toi= -0.75:0.1:1.65;         % chooses times of interest, currently looking between -0.75 pre stimulus  to 1.65s post-stimulus in steps of 0.1s
>     cfg.keeptrials='yes';       % chooses whether to give average across trials or to keep individual trial values
>
>
>
>     %implement the frequency analysis
>     TFRall = ft_freqanalysis(cfg, data);
>
>
>
>     %baseline correct
>     bcfg.baseline = [-0.75 -0.5];
>     bcfg.baselinetype = 'db';
>     TFRall = ft_freqbaseline(bcfg, TFRall);
>
> I'd really appreciate any ideas on this,
> Jenny
>
> _____________________
>
> Jenny Tellett
> PhD Student
> PATCH Study Team
>
> Room C72  |  School of Psychology  |  University Park  |  University of Nottingham  |  NG7 2RD
> lpxjrt at nottingham.ac.uk  |  0115 84 66610
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
>
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>
> University of Nottingham.
>
>
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>
> permitted by UK legislation.
>




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.





More information about the fieldtrip mailing list