[FieldTrip] Source localizing resting state data (Luke Bloy)

Haiteng Jiang haiteng.jiang at gmail.com
Sun Apr 26 16:38:48 CEST 2015

Hi Luke,
    In my experience,  the best way to deal with central bias issue is
leadfield normalization on resting state .  This is much more robust
 compared to neural activity index (NAI) across subjects.  You can specify
cfg.normalize       = 'yes' when you compute leadfied
using ft_prepare_leadfield function . This strategy gave me satisfactory
results  in the end.

                               Hope this helps,

> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:55:14 -0400
> From: Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com>
> To: FieldTrip list serve <fieldtrip at science.ru.nl>
> Subject: [FieldTrip] Source localizing resting state data
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAG5Ru-pJKH91o9EHD+kc53TQXc8F3X4Ogsa0UOC5wiJmLPvEvA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> Hi everyone,
> Following up on two recent email threads (
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2015-April/009120.html
> and
>  http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2015-January/008796.html
> )
> I'd like to ask the fieldtrip community what they feel is the best source
> localization methods for resting state data? Note that at this point i'm
> only thinking about simple things like localizing resting alpha and beta
> rhythms.
> -Thanks
> Luke

Haiteng Jiang
PhD candidate
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Neuronal Oscillations Group
Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Lab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20150426/b709e5ca/attachment.html>

More information about the fieldtrip mailing list