[FieldTrip] Reject components on unfiltered data

[Max Cantor]

I can't speak for everyone, but we are filtering before ICA as of now. By
having the data filtered, the components created should be a better
representation of the actual effects rather than performing ICA on data not
filtered, and thus more efficient. We also perform epoching and baselining,
as well as a automatic artifact rejection of jump and muscle artifacts, and
one visual artifact rejection check to get rid of any extremely noisy
trials or channels.


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Raquel Bibi <bibi.raquel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Eelke,
> I often wonder if it is better to filter or not filter prior to ICA.
> While Carmen never asked, I wonder what is the 'Fieldtrip' Donders' view?
>
> Best,
>
> Raquel
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Carmen Kung <c.kung at donders.ru.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eelke,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the info! That's specific enough.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Carmen
>>
>> --
>> Carmen Kung
>> Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour
>> Radboud University Nijmegen
>> P. O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands
>> Tel: +31 24 36 12634
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> fieldtrip mailing list
>> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/**mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20131028/4eb52f17/attachment-0002.html>