[FieldTrip] Quality of beamforming on MNI template vs single-subject MRI
Andrea Brovelli
andrea.brovelli at univ-amu.fr
Thu Apr 4 16:31:29 CEST 2013
Thanks a lot Jorn, I 'll try out the different methods you suggested
to understand better at which step I loose significance.
Bye
Andrea
Le 04/04/2013 14:50, "Jörn M. Horschig" a écrit :
> I am not sure as you provide minimalistic insight into what you are
> exactly doing. If you use a single subject grid, the actual grid
> points for which you estimate source activity will be slightly
> different than when you base this on a template, so that might be one
> reason. Also you are probably doing monte carlo statistics, for which
> p-values will vary anyway for different runs (sidenote: check the
> newly implemented p-value confidecen interval, if they are
> overlapping, no need to worry). However, since you do not say how much
> the p-values differ, how many permutations you are running, what other
> parameters you choose etc., it's hard to judge whether this is
> something to worry about.
--
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list