[FieldTrip] indepsamplesF with sourcestatistics
Frederic Roux
fredericroux at hotmail.de
Sun Mar 18 15:51:21 CET 2012
Dear all,
I noticed that the result of sourcestatistics can be quite different when using cfg.statistic = 'indepsamplesF'
or also cfg.statistic ='indepsamplesregrT', depending on whether you specify a unit of observations (UO's)
variable in the design matrix or not.
For example when running the code without the UOs-variable as following
cfg.design(1,:) = [ones(1,length(indx1)) 2*ones(1,length(indx1)) 3*ones(1,length(indx1)) 4*ones(1,length(indx1))];
cfg.ivar = 1;
I get a different result than if I run:
cfg.design(1,:) = [ones(1,length(indx1)) 2*ones(1,length(indx2)) 3*ones(1,length(indx3)) 4*ones(1,length(indx4))];
cfg.design(2,:) = [indx1' indx2' indx3' indx4'];
cfg.ivar = 1;
cfg.uvar = 2;
Note that in the second case the indexes in the UOs variable are not sorted.
I guess that you are not supposed to run the code as in the second case,
but I would still like to know why I get different results. Shouldn't it be the same anyways?
It would be great to get an explanation for the discrepancy between both codes.
Best,
Fred
--
Frédéric Roux, PhD student
Department of Neurophysiology
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
D-60529 Frankfurt am Main
Frederic.Roux at brain.mpg.de
+49(0)69630183225
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20120318/c391e704/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list