baseline, combine_planar, and freqanalysis

Sangita Dandekar sangita.dandekar at GMAIL.COM
Fri Oct 1 18:00:41 CEST 2010


I'm wondering about the optimal order in which to apply combine_planar and
baselining (relative to a pretrial time window)  to time-frequency power
spectra data.

Does it make more sense to do:

1. meg_planar
2. freqanalysis
3. combine_planar
4. freqbaseline (on a trial by trial basis?  see below)

or B:
1. meg_planar
2. freqanalysis
3. freqbaseline(on a trial by trial basis? see below)
4. combine_planar

Also, are there any opinions on whether baselining on a trial by trial basis
is preferable o  if it might be better to instead baseline with respect to
the average of all pretrial baseline power spectra?

Thanks in advance,

The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the FieldTrip  toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also and
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the fieldtrip mailing list