[clean-list] Re: Is Clean a dead language? (Denis Smirnov)

[Benjamin L. Russell]

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:51:53 -0700 (PDT), Carlos Aya
<carlosayam at yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>> Don't let IO monad rule the world!
>
>From recent post in Haskell-caffe
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.haskell/browse_thread/thread/4373bf8adb5dff0f
>
>In there..
>
>>Lazy IO *as implemented (originally) in GHC* (and copied into the 
>>Haskell standard) breaks referential transparency.[1]  Clean's object IO 
>>system, I believe, would not have this problem.  Nor would a 
>>well-designed Haskell IO system. 
>>jcc 
>
>looks like a clear window of opportunity for Clean!
>
>The thing I complain about is that if you put "Haskell mysql" as opposed to "Clean mysql" in google the relevance of results is quite different. It took me a while to find lethevert's post.
>
>Yes, this is again a 'rebranding clean' email. Have you considered close spellings like 'cleen' for example?....

Another alternative name to consider is "Concurrent Clean."

-- Benjamin L. Russell
-- 
Benjamin L. Russell  /   DekuDekuplex at Yahoo dot com
http://dekudekuplex.wordpress.com/
Translator/Interpreter / Mobile:  +011 81 80-3603-6725
"Furuike ya, kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." 
-- Matsuo Basho^