[FieldTrip] preprocessing with and without "preproc" added
Lei, A. (Anqi)
anqi.lei at ru.nl
Thu Apr 7 12:42:47 CEST 2022
Hello there,
I'm wondering about the consequence of adding "preproc" to the preprocessing parameters (e.g. using "cfg.preproc.lpfilter") versus not adding it (e.g. just using "cfg.lpfilter").
I first tried preprocessing my data without adding "preproc" and got this following ft_fetch_data error when I tried to visualize the data using databrowser. However, after I added "preproc" to all the parameters, I no longer got this error and can visualize the data properly. Also, it seems like adding "preproc" changes the values in data_eeg.trial.
[cid:image001.png at 01D84A7C.FBAA6D00]
My preprocessing steps without adding "preproc" (gave me the error when I tried to visualize data_eeg):
cfg = [];
cfg.dataset = vhdr; % raw data file name
cfg.trialfun = 'ft_trialfun_general'; % selecting all trials for now
cfg.trialdef.prestim = 0.5; % time before marker in seconds (should be generous to avoid filtering artifacts)
cfg.trialdef.poststim = 1.5; % time after marker in seconds (should be generous to avoid filtering artifacts)
cfg.trialdef.eventvalue = {'S 12', 'S 14', 'S 13', 'S 15'}; % markers marking stimulus events in the final test
cfg.trialdef.eventtype = 'Stimulus';
% Define trials (in cfg.trl)
cfg = ft_definetrial(cfg); % fieldtrip function that specifies trials
% rereferencing data
cfg.reref = 'yes'; % data will be rereferenced
cfg.channel = setdiff(1:32, [1,12,17,32]); % in this step only for the EEG channels (including the right mastoid, elec 9)
cfg.implicitref = 'Ref'; % the implicit (non-recorded) reference channel is added to the data representation
cfg.refchannel = {'TP10', 'Ref'}; % the average of these channels is used as the new reference
% filtering data
cfg.lpfilter = 'yes'; % data will be lowpass filtered
cfg.lpfreq = 40; % lowpass frequency in Hz
cfg.hpfilter = 'no'; % data will NOT be highpass filtered, as this was already done online
% baseline correction
cfg.demean = 'yes';
% apply the set parameters on the data
data_eeg = ft_preprocessing(cfg);
My preprocessing steps after adding "preproc" (this did not give me error when I visualized data_eeg):
% defining settings for trial selection
cfg = [];
cfg.dataset = vhdr; % raw data file name
cfg.trialfun = 'ft_trialfun_general'; % selecting all trials for now
cfg.trialdef.prestim = 0.5; % time before marker in seconds (should be generous to avoid filtering artifacts)
cfg.trialdef.poststim = 1.5; % time after marker in seconds (should be generous to avoid filtering artifacts)
cfg.trialdef.eventvalue = {'S 12', 'S 14', 'S 13', 'S 15'}; % markers marking stimulus events in the final test
cfg.trialdef.eventtype = 'Stimulus';
% Define trials (in cfg.trl)
cfg = ft_definetrial(cfg); % fieldtrip function that specifies trials
% rereferencing data
cfg.preproc.reref = 'yes'; % data will be rereferenced
cfg.channel = setdiff(1:32, [1,12,17,32]); % in this step only for the EEG channels (including the right mastoid, elec 9)
cfg.preproc.implicitref = 'Ref'; % the implicit (non-recorded) reference channel is added to the data representation
cfg.preproc.refchannel = {'TP10', 'Ref'}; % the average of these channels is used as the new reference
% filtering data
cfg.preproc.lpfilter = 'yes'; % data will be lowpass filtered
cfg.preproc.lpfreq = 40; % lowpass frequency in Hz
cfg.preproc.hpfilter = 'no'; % data will NOT be highpass filtered, as this was already done online
% baseline correction
cfg.preproc.demean = 'yes';
%cfg.baselinewindow = [-0.2 0]; % no baseline correction necessary
% apply the set parameters on the data
data_eeg = ft_preprocessing(cfg);
Could you let me know why this might be the case?
Thank you!
Best,
Anqi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20220407/b2e7191a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 70036 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20220407/b2e7191a/attachment.png>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list