[FieldTrip] AAL atlas Anatomical parcellation

[Mohammad Ostadmohammadi]

I use following code to parcellate sources ( to know each source is at
which tissue of my atlas) and "atlas" is AAL. The output (tmp_mask) is too
much different for different subjects and don't know why!
cfg                       = [];
cfg.atlas             = atlas;
cfg.roi                = atlas.tissuelabel{i};
cfg.inputcoord = atlas.coordsys;
tmp_mask        = ft_volumelookup(cfg,source_model);
tmp_mask        = reshape(tmp_mask, [numel(tmp_mask), 1]);

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:48 AM Velden, Daniel <
daniel.velden at med.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:

> Dear Mohammad,
>
>
>
> if you used individual mri’s for each subject and performed mri
> reconstruction and parcellation on each individual mri, those
> reconstruction results should of course differ between subjects.
> Unfortunately, and based on your short explanation, I can’t tell how big
> the differences are. A little different is normal, huge differences may
> indicate a problem in your source localization pipeline.
>
>
>
> Greetings and all the best,
>
> Daniel van de Velden
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Daniel van de Velden (M.Sc.) || PhD candidate*
>
> *Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter*
>
> *Klinik für Klinische Neurophysiologie *
>
> *Georg-August-Universität Göttingen*
>
> *Robert-Koch.Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen*
>
> *Tel. 0551- 39-65106*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
> https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20190715/836ab49a/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
fieldtrip mailing list
https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202