[FieldTrip] Cross spectral density versus coherence
jordvink at gmail.com
Sun Feb 4 21:13:39 CET 2018
I am working with functional connectivity between different (EEG) signals.
I'm calculating the connectivity strength between different brain regions
and correlate the connectivity strength to a certain outcome measure. Among
others, I'm using the cross spectral density (CSD) and the coherence. The
CSD is not generally used as a measure of connectivity but I don't
completely understand why not. Especially since the CSD correlates well
with my outcome measure, while the coherence doesn't. I'm trying to
undertand whether there is a fundamental reason why I can't use the CSD,
and why I should use the coherence.
So I'm trying to understand why people use coherence (the normalized
version of the cross spectral density) as a measure of connectivity instead
of cross spectral density (CSD). Why do you have to normalize the CSD with
the autospectral densities to determine connectivity when the CSD by itself
is a measure of signal similarity? Is there a fundamental reason to
normalize the CSD?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fieldtrip