[FieldTrip] stat.stat matrix of ft_XXXstatistics

[Kamia Kavi]

Dear Julian,

Thanks for the tip!

Best wishes,

Mahmoud

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 1:35 PM Julian Keil <julian.keil at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Kavi,
>
> the t-values are not corrected for multiple comparisons. In order to check
> if a t-value has passed the significance criterion, you can take a look at
> the .mask-field. Here, each element is coded with either 0 (not
> significant) or 1 (significant).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julian
>
>
> Am 25.08.2018 um 20:24 schrieb Kamia Kavi <kamiakavi at gmail.com>:
>
> Hello FieldTrip-ers,
>
>
> Sorry in advance if my question is trivial!
>
>
> Using ft_timelockstatistics with cfg.method = 'montecarlo', can each
> element  which is a t-value in stat.stat matrix (assuming that we used
> t-value as our test statistic) be considered as a value corrected for
> multiple compressions?
>
>
> In other words, since we have used a non-parametric method (i.e.,
> permutation Meonte Carlo), can we assume that each element (i.e., a
> t-value) of stat.stat matrix is corrected for multiple comparisons? I would
> appreciate a clear explanation. Many thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
> https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
> https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20180827/e3659793/attachment.html>