[FieldTrip] Lost reference location

Vladimir Litvak litvak.vladimir at gmail.com
Wed Sep 21 16:26:28 CEST 2016


If you need to know the reference for analysis purposes the easiest thing
is to just rereference to another electrode or the average reference. Then
it wouldn't matter what the original reference was.

Best,

Vladimir

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Blume Christine <christine.blume at sbg.ac.at>
wrote:

> Dear Casper and Tineke,
>
>
>
> As voltage is always the difference between the reference and an
> electrode, voltages are lowest for electrodes closest to the reference
> electrode. You could check where voltages are minimal across trials and for
> each participant. If then for example that is close to Cz, it is likely
> that data were referenced to the vertex. Just an idea, it might work…but
> perhaps someone else has a better idea?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Christine
>
>
>
> *Von:* fieldtrip-bounces at science.ru.nl [mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@
> science.ru.nl] *Im Auftrag von *Casper van Heck
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 14:25
> *An:* fieldtrip at science.ru.nl
> *Betreff:* [FieldTrip] Lost reference location
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> We've recently started working on an old dataset, but have ran into a
> problem; nobody bothered to write down where the reference was placed...
> Does anybody have ideas on how to reconstruct the location of the
> reference, based on (some aspect of) the data?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Casper van Heck and Tineke van Rijn
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160921/3a7d632d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the fieldtrip mailing list