[FieldTrip] Question on tutorial http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate
parham hashemzadeh
ph442 at cam.ac.uk
Sun May 8 23:26:48 CEST 2016
Hi Jan
Thank you.
best regards parham
On 2016-05-08 20:35, Schoffelen, J.M. (Jan Mathijs) wrote:
> Hi Parham,
>
>> On 08 May 2016, at 19:07, parham hashemzadeh <ph442 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>> I was going through the tutorial:
>> http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate
>> My question involves the first realignment and reslicing followed by
>> second realignment and reslicing. I do not understand the step below:
>>
>> -> T = transform_vox2ctf/transform_vox2spm=
>> transform_vox2ctf*inv(transform_vox2spm)
>> and this matrix is applied to sourcespace.
>>
>> What confuses me, is that
>> a) we realign the anatomical voxel to spm (MNI) coordinates.
>> b) we reslice and save it as shown in step "3. Preprocessing of the
>> anatomical MRI: reslicing"
>> && 4. Preprocessing of the
>> anatomical MRI: save to disk
>> At this stage we get the transformation matrix anatomical voxel to spm
>> i.e transform_vox2spm
>> Moreover, we reside in the SPM coordinates now.
>> c) We then realign to CTF coordinates, no reslicing is done. we Should
>> GET transform_spm2ctf. However, the obtained transform is called
>> transform_vox2ct. Why???
>
> Because the transformation matrix that is attached to the mri
> structure is always going from voxel space to a human interpretable
> coordinate system.
>
>> We are using the resliced image mrirs= ft_volumereslice(cfg, mri_spm);
>> c) During the source creation, we are already in the MNI coordinates,
>> because we are using Subject01.mgz.
>
> The fact that the file has the extension *.mgz does not mean that it
> is in MNI coordinates. The Subject01.mgz is created in the tutorial to
> have a transformation attached to it, that goes from (resliced) voxels
> to MNI.
>
>> So, why in "STEP 4. Source model: Co-registration of the source space
>> to the sensor-based head coordinate system we do we need to "
>> T = transform_vox2ctf/transform_vox2spm;
>> Should it not be transform_vox2ctf changed to transform_spm2ctf
>> and T=transform_spm2ctf ???
>
> No, it shouldn’t.
>
> Best,
> Jan-Mathijs
>
>
>> best regards parham
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fieldtrip mailing list
>> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
--
best regards
Parham Hashemzadeh
Research Associate
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
University of Cambridge, UK.
email: hashemzadeh at damtp.cam.ac.uk
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list