[FieldTrip] Beamforming, "Inf" during source estimation by subject

[Tate, Lindsey R.]

Tate, Lindsey R. has shared a?OneDrive for Business?file with you. To view it, click the link below.


<https://sooners-my.sharepoint.com/personal/lindseyrtate_ou_edu/Documents/Email%20attachments/dataFIC4.mat>
[https://r1.res.office365.com/owa/prem/images/dc-generic_20.png]<https://sooners-my.sharepoint.com/personal/lindseyrtate_ou_edu/Documents/Email%20attachments/dataFIC4.mat>

dataFIC4.mat<https://sooners-my.sharepoint.com/personal/lindseyrtate_ou_edu/Documents/Email%20attachments/dataFIC4.mat>




Hello Fieldtrip Community,


I've been working on beamforming the MEG data collected from 16 subjects during a saccade task. This is my first time beamforming so I've been heavily relying on the tutorial.


When I collapse trials across subjects and do beamforming, I can get the ft_sourceplot commands to produce something that makes some sense. However, I need to be able to have the data separated by subject for ft_sourcestatistics. I've created structures that should work for this purpose and that look correct. However, the ".pow" from the Neural Activity Index calculation step ends up mostly "NaN" and partly "Inf" when I run the beamforming divided by subject.


Is this related to the number of trials per subject somehow (e.g., do I have too few? is there some kind of setting I need to change?)? Why is the ".pow" coming back "Inf" instead of a real number? Does anyone have suggestions for fixing this problem so that I don't get "Inf" anymore?


My code and raw data structure are attached.


Thank you,


Lindsey Tate

University of Oklahoma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160628/c97d6082/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: BF_trial4.m
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160628/c97d6082/attachment.ksh>