[FieldTrip] Adequate connectivity measure for continuous data

Jonas Chatel-Goldman jonas.chatel.goldman at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 16:43:25 CEST 2016


Dear Tzvetan,

thanks for your reply. However the reference you kindly provided doesn't
address the estimation of connectivity in the case of continuous data (all
mentioned measures seem to require being fed with multiple trials data).
Beside, it is a good tutorial but not really exhaustive (for instance not a
word on WPLI).


*Jonas *

2016-07-22 12:07 GMT+02:00 Tzvetan Popov <tzvetan.popov at uni-konstanz.de>:

> Dear Jonas,
>
> this paper is quite a good start:
> http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175/full
> Very accessible read also providing some playground data to begin with.
> Good luck,
> tzvetan
>
>
>
>
> Dear Fieldtrippers,
>
> In terms of connectivity measure for EEG signals, WPLI appears to have a
> good reputation among the neurophysio community. However it seems to
> require multiple trials for its estimation (e.g.,
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2015-August/009575.html).
> Could it be applied on continuous data (e.g., >1 minute resting state
> segments) and, if not, what could be an appropriate connectivity measure in
> this context?
>
> best,
>
>
> *Jonas *
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160722/b30d3d15/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the fieldtrip mailing list