[FieldTrip] Comparing ICA methods between toolboxes (BESA vs. Fieldtrip)

[Andrew Chang]

Dear Fieldtrip users,

I am wondering whether anyone has compared the performances of the ICA
methods among M/EEG toolboxes. Especially, how is the performance of ICA in
BESA Research 6.0, compared to Fieldtrip?
I have an EEG data set which has been processed in BESA, including removing
artifact using ICA. I am wondering whether I can trust it, or I should
reprocess it in Fieldtrip. Any comments will be appreciated!

Happy new year!

Best,
Andrew

-- 
Andrew Chang
Ph.D. Candidate
Auditory Development Lab
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour
McMaster University
http://changa5.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160110/36b3d104/attachment.html>