[FieldTrip] Filter Order for High Pass Filter

Max Cantor Max.Cantor at Colorado.EDU
Sat Sep 26 16:44:23 CEST 2015


Ok, I vaguely remembered that it had something to do with fieldtrip's
default filter, but I couldn't remember the specifics, thank you! I'll play
around with some other filter options and make sure I totally understand
what's happening, but I think between your explanation and the article
Vitoria recommended (which I still need to read but thank you!) I feel more
comfortable with my pipeline now. That being said, if anyone else has
further comments on the subject, further insight is always appreciated.

Thank you Andreas and Vitoria!

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Andreas Widmann <widmann at uni-leipzig.de>
wrote:

> Hi Max,
>
> the filter order defines how steep or shallow the transition between
> passband and stopband is (in the frequency response). The higher the
> steeper.
>
> For the Fieldtrip default Butterworth IIR filter this is -6 dB/oct per
> order (the order is doubled internally due to forward and backward
> filtering, so actually -12 dB/oct per order). For extreme filters (0.1 Hz
> highpass) Butterworth filters sometimes have stability issues (accumulating
> rounding errors). There’s now a strategy implemented dealing with these
> cases iirc.
>
> The order of IIR and FIR filters must not be directly compared. For FIR
> filters the order is the impulse response length minus one. Thus, to
> compare IIR and FIR the impulse response length should be compared. The
> above Butterworth filter has an impulse response length of 7880 points to
> be doubled due to forward and backward filtering (-1; 15759 points). A
> corresponding FIR filter (500 Hz, Hamming window) only requires 8251
> points. As most EEG textbooks explicitly recommend shorter filters over
> longer filters you might want to consider applying a FIR filter (e.g.,
> cfg.hpfilttype = 'firws‘; cfg.hpfiltdir = 'onepass-zerophase';).
>
> Best,
> Andreas
>
> > Am 26.09.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Max Cantor <Max.Cantor at Colorado.EDU>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I used to be mcantor at umich.edu, now I'm max.cantor at colorado.edu, but
> I'm the same Max Cantor as before :).
> >
> > That out of the way, here is my question:
> >
> > In the these threads -
> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2014-August/008308.html
> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2012-June/005351.html
> >
> > The issue of fieldtrip's ability to do low valued high pass filters is
> addressed, and I was successfully able to implement a a bpfilter of [0.1
> 50] hz using a filter order of 1, and I compared it to my new lab's eeglab
> pipeline's ERP for a given subject and was able to get a more or less
> identical output. However, it's been awhile since I've read some of the
> nitty gritty signal processing, and I forget what exactly this means or
> what the significance of it is.
> >
> > Even though I was able to more or less replicate their current pipeline,
> I'd still like to understand what exactly setting the filter order is doing
> and what the significance of it may be. If anyone can explain this to me or
> set me in the right direction (a suggested chapter in Steve Luck or Matt
> Cohen's book, or a good article, for instance), I would greatly appreciate
> it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Max
> >
> > --
> > Max Cantor
> > Graduate Student
> > Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Lab
> > University of Colorado Boulder
> > _______________________________________________
> > fieldtrip mailing list
> > fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
>


-- 
Max Cantor
Graduate Student
Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20150926/d8a4c2ac/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the fieldtrip mailing list