[FieldTrip] "mask" option being ignored when plotting source statistics
A. Donda
a.donda at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 12 17:26:04 CET 2015
Hi everybody,
when trying to plot the results of the group-level source statistics with the option "mask", it seems that ft_sourceplot ignores the "mask" option and just plots all values of the t-statistic map.
I even changed manually the field data.mask (taking logic values 0 / 1) to see whether that affects the plot, but nothing changes. Is there something obvious in the plotting function "ft_sourceplot" that I oversaw?
The result of statistics for differences between two source estimates has the following structure:
stat = prob: [38x48x41 double] cirange: [38x48x41 double] mask: [38x48x41 logical] stat: [38x48x41 double] ref: [38x48x41 double] dim: [38 48 41] inside: [1x37163 double] outside: [1x37621 double] pos: [74784x3 double] freq: 22.4439 cfg: [1x1 struct]
Then I interpolate the stat data to one normalized (to MNI space) mri from one subject
cfg = [];cfg.parameter = 'all';statplot = ft_sourceinterpolate(cfg, stat, norm);
To plot only significant voxels I use stat.mask (i.e. statplot.mask: values 0 and 1) to mask the data, but it is ignored when plotting:
cfg = [];cfg.method = 'ortho';cfg.funparameter = 'stat';cfg.maskparameter = 'mask';cfg.maskstyle = 'saturation';cfg.opacitymap = 'rampup';cfg.opacitylim =[0 1]figureft_sourceplot(cfg, statplot);
The plot simply shows all values of the funparameter statplot.stat
If I missed sthg, I would be grateful for any feedback. Thanks!
A. Donda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20150212/17c864de/attachment.html>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list