[FieldTrip] WPLI for individual trials

[Craig Richter]

Hi Jan-Mathijs,

I read you loud and clear.

Richard, if you think the method Jan-Mathijs describes will work for your application, I can explain to you my method for computing it using FT.

Best,

C.

> On 30 Aug 2015, at 17:40, Schoffelen, J.M. (Jan Mathijs) <jan.schoffelen at donders.ru.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> In general it is not possible to obtain a ‘single observation’ phase synchrony metric, where this metric is based on the distributional properties (i.e. across observations) of the phase difference. This holds not only for quantities like coherence, but also for WPLI. This being said, one could resort to a leave-one-out strategy, called jackknifing, to get an estimate of how much an individual trial contributes to the overall connectivity estimate. This has been formally described in http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915003316. Note that in order for this to work, you still need to have multiple trials in your input data. FieldTrip used to support the cfg.jackknife option in ft_connectivityanalysis for the computation of coherence, but I don’t know to what extent this generalizes to WPLI. Also, it’s been a while that I used this (i.e. jackknife) option (for coherence), so I am not sure whether this is still operational in the current version of FieldTrip. (since this option is a bit obscure, we have not done our utmost best to maintain backward-compatibility of the code here, so things may have been broken by general improvements to the code base). If you would like to follow up on this, I suggest you to contact the first author on the paper mentioned (above), I am sure that Craig would be willing to point you into the right direction (as far as he is not yet reading along … Craig, do you copy, over?).
> 
> Best,
> Jan-Mathijs
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Richard Bethlehem <rb643 at medschl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Fieldtrippers,
>> 
>> Would anyone be able to tell me how ft_connectivity analysis handles the trials input? Is it possible to get a WPLI connectivity matrix for each individual trial?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> ps: code I am currently using is here: https://github.com/autism-research-centre/fieldtrip_restingState/blob/master/wpli_connectivity.m 
>> _______________________________________________
>> fieldtrip mailing list
>> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>