[FieldTrip] Is fieldtrip software suitable for processing computational simulation data

[Bingshuo Li]

Dear Mr. Wang,

I don't see the reason why you cannot use FieldTrip to analyze those data.
Quantitatively, the simulation generated data you have should not be
different than real (i.e. recorded) data. In our lab, we use FieldTrip to
analyze multi-unit data. So far it's been proven that FieldTrip is fairly
good!

You may want to take a look at this tutorial (if you have not done so)
http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/tutorial/spike

Good luck!



-----
Bingshuo Li (MSc. candidate)
Systems Neurophysiology Group
Centre for Integrative Neuroscience
University of Tuebingen
Otfried-Mueller-Str. 25
D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
bingshuo.li at student.uni-tuebingen.de
+49-7071-29-89029


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:11 AM, 王大明 <damingwang.tongji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear friends:
>
> I am student from China and currently very interested in your software of
> fieldtrip. There is a question puzzling me:
>
> If I use integrate-and-fire or other neural models to simulate and get
> spike and LFP(local field potential) data, is fieldtrip still suitable for
> processing these data? And the main part which I concern mostly is spike
> and LFP data analysis.
>
> Your reply and help will be sincerely appreciated! Thank you!
>
>
> Best Wishes
>
>
>   Daming Wang
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20140319/f37166a0/attachment.html>