[FieldTrip] fieldtrip Digest, Vol 30, Issue 20

[Eelke Spaak]

Hi Eric,

Thanks, that's what I expected. However, that approach does not take
into account the different between-trial variances in the different
subjects. What would you recommend to take those into account?

Best,
Eelke

On 16 May 2013 16:31, Eric Maris <e.maris at psych.ru.nl> wrote:
> Hi Eelke,
>
> This not valid. At the second level, you must use the condition means (per subject) as the observations about which you have a hypothesis and which therefore have to be permuted.
>
> Eric
>
>
> http://www.nphyscog.com/contact
> ----- fieldtrip-request at science.ru.nl schreef:
>> Send fieldtrip mailing list submissions to
>> fieldtrip at science.ru.nl
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> fieldtrip-request at science.ru.nl
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> fieldtrip-owner at science.ru.nl
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of fieldtrip digest..."
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip