[FieldTrip] (no subject)

[Stenner, Max-Philipp]

...just to specify the question: I am wondering whether ft_average_sens of data in planar sensor gradiometer representation is problematic

________________________________________
Von: fieldtrip-bounces at donders.ru.nl [fieldtrip-bounces at donders.ru.nl]" im Auftrag von "Stenner, Max-Philipp [max-philipp.stenner at med.ovgu.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. März 2012 19:53
Bis: Email discussion list for the FieldTrip project
Betreff: [FieldTrip] (no subject)

Dear fieldtrip users/developers,

I'd like to perform time-frequency analysis after computing the planar gradiometer representation of multi-session data and I am wondering whether the order in which the analysis steps are performed matters. The sequence I have used is

ft_megplanar
concatenate data across sessions
ft_average_sens, add the averaged (planar) sensor information to the datapool
ft_freqanalysis
ft_combineplanar

Does that make sense?

Thanks very much,
best
Max
fieldtrip version: fieldtrip-20111130 on a Windows7 PC
_______________________________________________
fieldtrip mailing list
fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip