[FieldTrip] 回复: Re: about when to filter

蔡林 bertram0611 at pku.edu.cn
Tue Dec 18 15:46:37 CET 2012


Hi, Roemer
    Thank you!
    I preprocess the EEG raw data by NeuroScan instead of fieldtrip.I do not know when to filter the data. I want to filter the raw data at first, and then reduce the ocular artifacts, and then epoch...Am I right?
Lin
----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人: Roemer van der Meij <r.vandermeij at donders.ru.nl>
收件人: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip at science.ru.nl>
已发送邮件: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:00:38 +0800 (CST)
主题: Re: [FieldTrip] about when to filter

Hi Lin,

Could you provide a little more information? How did you reduce your ocular
artifacts? How did you filter your data? What kind of fieldtrip settings
did you use, and what fieldtrip version were you using? Adding a picture of
the artifacts you're referring to might also help.

All the best,
Roemer


On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:55 AM, 蔡林 <bertram0611 at pku.edu.cn> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>     Now I have an urgent problem about how to filter EEG data recorded in
> NeuroScan. I don't know the distiction between raw data(ie. cnt file)and
> the data after ocular artifact reduction. I filtered these two different
> data, and then I got diffrent results. Especially, I found many vertical
> lines after filtering the data through ocular artifact reduction, but I
> didn't find vertical lines filtering raw data.
>     Please give me some advice about how to filter offset. Thank you in
> advance.
>
> --
> Lin Cai
> Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R.China
>
> Spam detection software, running on the system "kompost.science.ru.nl",
> has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
> postmaster at science.ru.nl for details.
>
> Content preview:  Hi all, Now I have an urgent problem about how to filter
> EEG
>    data recorded in NeuroScan. I don't know the distiction between raw
> data(ie.
>    cnt file)and the data after ocular artifact reduction. I filtered these
> two
>    different data, and then I got diffrent results. Especially, I found
> many
>    vertical lines after filtering the data through ocular artifact
> reduction,
>    but I didn't find vertical lines filtering raw data. Please give me some
>   advice about how to filter offset. Thank you in advance. [...]
>
> Content analysis details:   (6.2 points, 5.0 required)
>
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>  3.2 CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER A foreign language charset used in headers
>  3.0 BAYES_95               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99%
>                             [score: 0.9800]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fieldtrip mailing list
> fieldtrip at donders.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip
>



-- 
Roemer van der Meij M.Sc.
PhD Candidate
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Centre for Cognition
P.O. Box 9104
6500 HE Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31(0)24 3655932
E-mail: r.vandermeij at donders.ru.nl

-- 
Lin Cai
Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R.China




More information about the fieldtrip mailing list