[FieldTrip] question on beamformers
Marcel.Bastiaansen at mpi.nl
Mon Jan 24 11:44:07 CET 2011
I have the following conceptual issue with using beamforming:
I have data from 2 conditions, A and B. Both contain a prestimulus
interval and a poststimulus interval.
When plotting the TF representations of power, using a *relative*
baseline (poststimulus interval / prestimulus interval), a strong
difference emerges between the conditions in the beta frequency range.
Especially if I plot the *difference between the conditions*, the beta
effect is long-lasting, narrow-band and topographically focused. Ideal
for beamforming, I'd say.
In setting up the beamformer analysis, I am faced with the following
issue: the effect is most clearly present in the *relative* power
changes, so I would want to compute spatial filters for both the pre and
the post time intervals. My hunch would be to compute common spatial
filters for both pre intervals (preA and preB), and common filters for
both post intervals (postA and postB). Then, (after projecting the
trials through the filters), compute the relative power again (pre/post
for each condition). Does this approach make sense?
Next question is then, at which point in the analysis pipeline should
one do the condition subtraction? (I'd want to do that because at the
TFR level the effect comes out most clearly in the condition difference)
dr. Marcel C.M. Bastiaansen.
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Visiting Adress: Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Mailing adress: P.O. Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, the Netherlands
phone: +31 24 3521 347
fax: +31 24 3521 213
mail: marcel.bastiaansen at mpi.nl
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
Visiting address: Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Mailing address: PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
phone: + 31 24 3610 882
fax: + 31 24 3610 989
mail: marcel.bastiaansen at fcdonders.ru.nl
More information about the fieldtrip