fit volume segment and sensors?
Marc Recasens
recasensmarc at GMAIL.COM
Fri May 7 16:59:03 CEST 2010
Thanks Jan for the rapid response,
I followed the steps using ctf coords and the segmented volume fits
perfectly well in the skull using sourceplot. The volume seems to fit better
into the headshape. However, as can be seen in the picture, there's still a
big space from the posterior part of the brain to the posterior part of the
head shape. I suppose this Can be due to a bad realignment (?). As I
mentioned, I have no fiducial points in the MRI scans, so I have to select
the nas, lpa and rpa with no physical reference. I guess there is no
alternative in this case but using another volume or trying to align the
volume manually until it fits in the headshape, isn't it? Can the volume
segment be aligned in connection to the headshape automatically?
thank you for the help!
Bests,
[image: CTFvolume.jpg]
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:01 AM, jan-mathijs schoffelen <
jan.schoffelen at donders.ru.nl> wrote:
> Dear Marc,
>
> It seems to me that there is an issue with the coordinate system in which
> your original MRI is expressed. This could be related to the order of the
> steps you take, so I would permute the order and see whether this makes any
> difference at all (for me it usually works fine as follows:)
>
> First do a call to ft_volumerealign using your single subject's MRI. This
> step should give you the transformation matrix from voxel to headspace
> according to CTF's convention (which happens to be the same as 4d).
> Then do a segmentation of the output of ft_volumerealign, but note that you
> should specify ctf.coordinates = 'ctf'.
> Then you can proceed to create the single shell volume conductor model
> (after checking whether the segmentation worked fine with respect to the
> orientation etc of the resulting volumes; I believe there is some
> documentation about this on the website) and plot the results.
>
> Hopefully this helps,
>
> Best,
>
> Jan-Mathijs
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Marc Recasens wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm new in Fieldtrip and I find myself needed of some help :)
> I'm currently analysing some MEG data (4D-Neuroimaging, Magnes 2500WH) and
> trying to create a Single-Shell headmodel using a segmented mri.
> . I've read all the documentation on FT website but I'm still stuck. The
> volume never fits in the correct position inside the sensor helmet.
>
> First of all, I create a segmented MRI using Analyse images (.img'), and
> the segmentation is performed using:
> cfg.coordinates = 'spm';
> cfg.template = 'C:\...\MATLAB\R2007a\toolbox\spm2\templates\T1.mnc';
> segmentedmri = ft_volumesegment (cfg, mri);
> segmentedmri.anatomy = mri.anatomy; <--- I use that for posterior
> volumerealign.
>
> Then, I do a volumerealign by selecting manually the fiducial points (Nas,
> Lpa, Rpa), as I actually don't have fiducials on the MRI scans.
> cfg.method = 'realignfiducial';
> cfg.fiducial.nas = Nas; <--- (I get this from headshape.fid)
> cfg.fiducial.lpa = Lpa;
> cfg.fiducial.rpa = Rpa;
> segmented_r = ft_volumerealign (cfg, segmentedmri);
>
>
> Finally I create a volume through the ft_prepare_singleshell (cfg,
> segmented_r) function and plot it.
> I have the fiducials or head position coils and the scalp registered by
> means of a Polhemus digitizer..
> Though the segment via ft_sourceplot (doing the: segment.avg.pow =
> segment.gray+...) looks right, the headmodelplot shows that the volume and
> the headshape don't fit.
>
> Is there any possibility to realign the segmented mri according either to
> the headshape points either to the MEG fiducials? I'm afraid the answer is
> no in both cases (as the MRI and MEG coordinates are different). I tried to
> realign the segment interactively by selecting the positions where the coils
> in the MRI should be... but as the picture shows, it doesn't fit.
> am I doing something wrong or skipping some important step?
> Is it possible to transform MRI coordinate system to MEG-head coordinate
> system? Would it help?
>
>
> <singleshell.jpg><singleshell2.jpg>
>
> I attach a picture of what i've managed to do till now!
>
>
>
> Thanks for all!!!
>
>
>
> --
> Marc Recasens
> Tel.: +34 639 24 15 98
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the
> FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and
> EEG analysis.
>
> http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html
>
> http://www.ru.nl/fcdonders/fieldtrip/
>
>
> Dr. J.M. (Jan-Mathijs) Schoffelen
> Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour,
> Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging,
> Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
> J.Schoffelen at donders.ru.nl
> Telephone: 0031-24-3668063
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the
> FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and
> EEG analysis.
>
> http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html
>
> http://www.ru.nl/fcdonders/fieldtrip/
>
--
Marc Recasens
Tel.: +34 639 24 15 98
----------------------------------
The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html and http://www.ru.nl/neuroimaging/fieldtrip.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20100507/69d77dcd/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CTFvolume.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 28004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20100507/69d77dcd/attachment-0002.jpg>
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list