clustering after sensor picking?
Walther, Alexander
awalthermail at GOOGLEMAIL.COM
Sun Dec 20 21:59:46 CET 2009
Dear list,
I am facing a question regarding the MCP in time-frequency-analysis. In
order to boost the effect size, I picked several ROIs on the MEG scalp
by running a Task-versus-Basline Comparison (values averaged over all
subjects, all conditions, timepoints and frequencies) and selecting the
highest raw effect patches. Since FDR-correction seems to be too
conservative and yields no results in following analyses, I tried the
cluster-method which works pretty well. Is it (statistically) correct to
apply clustering after sensor picking? Since its test statistic refers
to the clustering of /adjacent/ sensor-pairs of the whole spatiotemporal
grid (which does not exist any more after the selection of ROIs), I
wonder whether it is still appropriate. Any advice would be helpful.
Merry xmas in advance!
Best
Alex
----------------------------------
The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the FieldTrip toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html and http://www.ru.nl/neuroimaging/fieldtrip.
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list