clusterrandanalysis vs timelockstatistics

[Susana Silva]

Hi all

I have run both clusterrandanalysis and timelockstatistics (with
cfg.correctm=cluster) over the same data.
The t values in clusrand (clusterrandanalysis) are equal to the t values in
stat (timelockstatistics).

However, in timelockstatistics, the number of clusters is much higher and
the prob is much lower than in the clusterrandanalysis procedure.

1-Should I expect it?
2-where can I get some more information on clusrandanalysis function (the
tutorial does not seem to have)?

Thank you
Susana Silva

----------------------------------
The aim of this list is to facilitate the discussion between users of the FieldTrip  toolbox, to share experiences and to discuss new ideas for MEG and EEG analysis. See also http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/fieldtrip.html and http://www.ru.nl/fcdonders/fieldtrip.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20081017/c1d6f5b1/attachment.html>