freqdescriptives
Matsuhashi, Masao (NIH/NINDS)
matsuham at NINDS.NIH.GOV
Mon Nov 8 22:33:12 CET 2004
Hello Robert,
I also copied the axial2planar.m and modified the number of gradiometers
from 151 to 274, and now it works.
The result in our condition is
================
method 1: 0.715570
method 2: 0.923964
method 3: 0.929785
method 4: 0.977297
method 5: 0.715570
================
Actually, the result of 'orig' method is flower-like and so different from
the original.
While doing this, I got the following warning message. Is this ok?
================
Warning: higher order synthetic gradiometer configuration(?)
> In fieldtrip\private\prepare_vol_sens at 145
In dipolesimulation at 35
================
Another question: what is the unit of cfg.dip.mom to give to
dipolesimulation(). With the unit vector [1,0,0] as in the above test
script, the output (axial.trial) is in the order of 1e-9, where the actual
recorded signal is usually less than 1e-11. Therefore it is not likely nAm.
I am thinking of mixing the simulated data to the real brain background
activity.
------------------------------------------------
Masao Matsuhashi, MD, DMS
NINDS, NIH
Tel: 1-301-594-9139
E-mail: MatsuhaM at ninds.nih.gov
------------------------------------------------
More information about the fieldtrip
mailing list