[clean-list] Dynamic typing for communication with non-cleanprograms

Bas Lijnse b.lijnse at cs.ru.nl
Mon Nov 21 15:02:45 MET 2011


The JSON libraries that Erik mentions are available from:
https://svn.cs.ru.nl/repos/clean-platform/trunk/src/libraries/OS-Independent/Text/

I always use this when I want to do simple data exchange between Clean
and another language (I may be biased as author/maintainer of the
library though :) )

Best,
Bas

On 21-11-11 14:52, zuurb078 at planet.nl wrote:
>
> And dump all the hard work on Java? Dynamics are a proprietary Clean
> format and likely more complex/liberal than you need. Maybe JSON is
> easier to use: probably available in your JAVA implementation already
> and under the hood JSON converters are already available in Clean iTasks.
>
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: clean-list-bounces at science.ru.nl namens Groenouwe, C.
> Verzonden: ma 21-11-2011 13:39
> Aan: pieter at cs.ru.nl
> CC: clean-list at science.ru.nl
> Onderwerp: [clean-list] Dynamic typing for communication with
> non-cleanprograms
>
> Dear Pieter (and others),
>
> Then another question:
>
> If you want to send information from one programming language (e.g.
> Java) to Clean, a typical way to go would be the following. First
> define an intermediate representation (for example in XML, or your own
> format). Then write a generator on the sender's side (in this case in
> Java), which converts a Java value or object into a file in the
> intermediate representation. Finally, write a parser on the receiver's
> side (Clean) which parses file holding the intermediate representation
> into a Clean value (with a Clean type). This is a labourious process
> during which you have the feeling you are are doing a lot of
> unnecessary work. As if you are repackaging the same sandwich three
> times in a row, first in a Java structure, then in the intermediate
> structure, and then again in a Clean structure... Waste of time (and
> the environment...) ;-)
>
> However, I had an idea: is it possible to use Clean's dynamic types
> for this purpose? Instead of generating some arbitrary intermediate
> type on the sender's side, immediately generate a value that can be
> read by Clean's dynamic type system. This would cut your work in half:
> you don't have to write a parser on Clean's side any more.
>
> I don't have any experience using Clean's dynamic typing yet,
> therefore I decided to first ask whether it is a fruitful approach
> before exploring it. Thus, is this possible and is it a good idea? Of
> course, I'm also open to other suggestions.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Chide
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clean-list mailing list
> clean-list at science.ru.nl
> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/clean-list/attachments/20111121/86d81035/attachment.html>


More information about the clean-list mailing list