[clean-list] Synonym type and Universal type

[TK]

>
> >Is this by design? If so then could one inquire about the rationale
> behind such a decision?
>
> A large part of the compiler was reimplemented and class contexts in
> type definitions are not defined in the language report.


I mean... Has there has been a decision not to include it? ( for being
useless, discouraged or alike )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/clean-list/attachments/20070526/63dc1b22/attachment.html