<div dir="ltr">Dear Tzvetan,<div><br></div><div>That worked perfectly, thank you! Are there guidelines for use of mesh inflation? E.g., does dilation by two voxels greatly bias source reconstruction? If one inflates a subject's mesh, must one then inflate all other subjects' meshes to the same degree? </div><div><br></div><div>Thank you again,</div><div>Uri <br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-07-02 16:54 GMT+02:00 Tzvetan Popov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de" target="_blank">tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de</a><wbr>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space">Dear Uri,<div><br></div><div>the solution to the problem (mesh inflation) is outlined in this tutorial: <a href="http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/dipolefitting?s%5B%5D=natmeg&s%5B%5D=headmodel#procedure" target="_blank">http://www.fieldtrip<wbr>toolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/<wbr>dipolefitting?s[]=natmeg&s[]=<wbr>headmodel#procedure</a></div><div><br></div><div>Scroll down to the section "Construct the EEG volume conduction model"<h3 class="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843sectionedit18" id="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843construct_the_eeg_volume_conduction_model"><a class="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843anchorjs-link" href="http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/natmeg/dipolefitting?s[]=natmeg&s[]=headmodel#construct_the_eeg_volume_conduction_model" style="font-family:anchorjs-icons;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:1;padding-left:0.375em" target="_blank"></a></h3><div>Good luck,</div><div>tzvetan</div><div><br></div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="m_-6691899920915690959h5"><div>Am 02.07.2018 um 14:37 schrieb Uri Eduardo Ramírez Pasos <<a href="mailto:urieduardo@gmail.com" target="_blank">urieduardo@gmail.com</a>>:</div><br class="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843Apple-interchange-newline"></div></div><div><div><div class="m_-6691899920915690959h5"><div dir="ltr">Dear Fieldtrippers,<div><br></div><div>I have followed the Salzburg tutorial (<a href="http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/salzburg" style="font-size:12.800000190734863px" target="_blank">http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.o<wbr>rg/tutorial/salzburg</a><span class="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843gmail-m_2180451013415369572sew1iwc8sn4inn9" style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"></span><span class="m_-6691899920915690959m_6249598690661499843gmail-m_2180451013415369572sew8szmhvxp11k5" style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"></span><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">) to conduct EEG source reconstruction, but it doesn't work with some subjects' segmented mri files (whether I use dipoli or bemcp), due to intersections between surfaces. </span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">What are the typical trouble-shooting steps for this situation? I tried using a lower number of vertices for the mesh ([800 800 600]), to no avail. Are there any guidelines for the number of vertices? </span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">The number of subjects in my study is limited, so I would be loathe to exclude any subject from the analysis.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">Best regards,</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">Uri Ramirez</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.800000190734863px">University of Würzburg</span></div></div></div></div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>fieldtrip mailing list<br><a href="https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip" target="_blank">https://mailman.science.ru.nl/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journa<wbr>l.pcbi.1002202</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
fieldtrip mailing list<br>
<a href="https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.science.ru.nl/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journa<wbr>l.pcbi.1002202</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>