<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style></head><body style="word-wrap:break-word"><div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0);margin:0px;line-height:auto">Dear Liang,</div><div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0);margin:0px;line-height:auto">cc Tzvetan, FieldTrip</div> <div><br></div>See the conversation below - Tzvetan has indicated that the volumetric representation is already missing IPS5. It would be great to try and redo the projection into volume space and play with the threshold to make sure that all regions are at least assigned to one voxel.<div><br></div><div>Best,<br><div><div><br> <div id="bloop_sign_1500365087331336960" class="bloop_sign"><div>—</div><div>Anne E. Urai, MSc</div><div>PhD student | Institut für Neurophysiologie und Pathophysiologie</div><div>Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf | Martinistrasse 52, 20246 | Hamburg, Germany</div><div><a href="http://www.anneurai.net">www.anneurai.net</a> / @AnneEUrai</div></div> <div class="airmail_ext_on" style="color:black"><br>From: <span style="color:black">Tzvetan Popov</span> <a href="mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de"><tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de></a><br>Reply: <span style="color:black">FieldTrip discussion list</span> <a href="mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl"><fieldtrip@science.ru.nl></a><br>Date: <span style="color:black">18 July 2017 at 09:28:28</span><br>To: <span style="color:black">FieldTrip discussion list</span> <a href="mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl"><fieldtrip@science.ru.nl></a><br>Subject: <span style="color:black"> Re: [FieldTrip] vtpm atlas contains no right IPS5 <br></span></div><br> <blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><span><div style="word-wrap:break-word" class=""><div></div><div>
<title></title>
<div>Dear Anne,<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;margin:0px" class="">
<pre style="white-space:pre-wrap" class=""></pre>
<div id="bloop_customfont" style="white-space:normal;margin:0px" class="">
<div class="" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px">I've been in
touch with Dr. Liang Wang (first author on the paper), but he could
only point me to the original NIfTI files on the website which have
been converted in AFNI</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;margin:0px" class="">
<pre style="white-space:pre-wrap" class=""></pre>
<div id="bloop_customfont" style="white-space:normal;margin:0px" class="">
<div class="" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px">Do you know by
any chance which author provided the mat file</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I have created the mat file working from the nifti files. I don’t
have the code anymore but it wasn’t too difficult. Yet, this code
wouldn’t help since the ROI isn’t in the nifti files to begin with.
I had exchange RE: missing ROI with Michael Arcaro back then. Here
is what he wrote:</div>
<div><br class=""></div>
<div>"As you said, ROI 23 does not appear to be in the volume lh
map.<br class="">
It’s there in the surface max prob map for the lh. I know Liang
generated a separate probability map using nonlinear volumetric
alignment, which was a little bit worse in quality than the surface
map. It’s possible you’re using that map. I thought we sent you the
volume projection of the surface max probability map though. It’s
possible that the small area of ROI3 in the surface max probability
map did not survive the projection back into volume space (since
there is interpolation in the projection). I’ll double check with
Liang and Ryan and see if they remember any issues with ROI23. It
might be better to use the individual probability map for ROI 23
and use a more liberal threshold."</div>
<div><br class=""></div>
<div>So it seems that Liang could indeed provide some more info on
whether and how to use a more liberal threshold to get the ROI back
into the volumetric representation?</div>
<div><br class=""></div>
<div>Best</div>
<div>tzvetan</div>
<div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________
<br>fieldtrip mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a>
<br><a href="https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">https://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a></div></div></span></blockquote></div></div></div></body></html>