<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,102)"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,102)"><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Dear all,</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><span></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">My results based on </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">source analysis and network-based </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">parcellation</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> shows significant differences</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">between two groups in cerebellar regions. </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">I wonder how reliable these results would be given that MEG is not explicitly modelled during forward problem? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt">Best,</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt">Vahab</p></div></div></div></div>