<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Thank you Jan and <i>Cristiano;<br></i><br>I downloaded another version of Fieldtrip thus the below error disappear:<br><pre>Error in triangle4pt (line 57)
sph_pnt = pnt([tri(jj,:) lv],:);<br><br>But now I have another error:<br><br>Error using surface_nesting (line 26)<br>the compartment nesting cannot be determined<br><br>Error in ft_headmodel_bemcp (line 66)<br>order = surface_nesting(vol.bnd, 'insidefirst');<br><br>Error in ft_prepare_headmodel (line 253)<br> vol = ft_headmodel_bemcp(geometry, 'conductivity', cfg.conductivity);<br><br>Error in openmeeg_eeg_leadfield_example (line 100)<br>vol = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, vol);<br></pre>Thank you for any suggestion<br><br><i>Cristiano, I record the contraction of the uterus;<br><br><br>Best regards<br>Saeed Zahran<br></i><br><div>> From: fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<br>> Subject: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 19<br>> To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:00:02 +0100<br>> <br>> Send fieldtrip mailing list submissions to<br>> fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> <br>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<br>> <br>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> fieldtrip-owner@science.ru.nl<br>> <br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of fieldtrip digest..."<br>> <br>> <br>> Today's Topics:<br>> <br>> 1. Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> 2. Re: Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid) (RICHARDS, JOHN)<br>> 3. Re: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18 (saeed zahran)<br>> 4. Re: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> (Schoffelen, J.M. (Jan Mathijs))<br>> <br>> <br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:39:30 +0100<br>> From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> To: Fieldtrip <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> Message-ID: <5ee6eeedb5d8a3a42f96840711d87ef1@mail.uni-kiel.de><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Dear Cris,<br>> <br>> thank you very much for your answers yesterday. The segmentedmri<br>> contained 'white', 'grey' and 'csf' so I needed to repeat the<br>> segmentation using 'brain', 'skull' and 'scalp' as described in the<br>> tutorial "Creating a BEM volume conduction model of the head for<br>> source-reconstruction of EEG data" and everything worked smoothly<br>> afterwards. The problem is solved now.<br>> <br>> Best,<br>> Laith <br>> <br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/e700c8d6/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 2<br>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:39:13 +0000<br>> From: "RICHARDS, JOHN" <RICHARDS@mailbox.sc.edu><br>> To: "fieldtrip@science.ru.nl" <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>,<br>> "lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de" <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> Message-ID: <D0C0492E-CD7A-43AA-960D-189E95D5309B@mailbox.sc.edu><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Laith:<br>> <br>> I have a ?neurodevelopmental MRI database? (Richards, Sanchez et al., 2015; see my www site) that has average MRI templates that could be used. Each average has the whole head down to about the top of the neck. I did these purposely since I use EEG recording and the MNI template did not even go down far enough for the EGI 128 channel net. <br>> <br>> The database has average MRI templates for head (T1, T2) and brain. I also have FEM segmented heads for the entire head that could be used for this. Additionally, I have BEM segmented heads (e.g., brain, csf, skull, scalp), but ironically, I cut these off about 10% below the EGI 128 channel electrodes. However, you could use the three inner compartments for this and just add the rest of the head below the compartment?or use the whole-head FEM as is for a FEM-model, or use the segmented area below the skull for a whole-head BEM model. I also have average 128-channel EGI electrodes for each template.<br>> <br>> Additionally, the ?developmental? part of the ?neurodevelopmental MRI database? is that I have these for a wide range of ages (all ages?). I have a average for young adults (20-24 yrs), and average templates and FEM/BEM models for groups from 3 months through adulthood, and into late adulthood. So if you have specific neuro-pediatric applications you might be interested in using an age appropriate MRI average template rather than an adult template. <br>> <br>> See my www site for journal article references re this, and http://jerlab.psych.sc.edu/NeurodevelopmentalMRIDatabase/<br>> <br>> Finally? I have been using these head models for FT-based FEM and BEM models. Possibly some of the actually field trip models I have would be useful to you. Some of the parts of the model do not use the electrodes (e.g., grid-dipoles, head-model) whereas the final models (leadfield) requires the electrode locations. The database also includes ?virtual? electrodes for the 10-10 system, which might be used to generate the 256 channel locations by knowing the relation between the 10-10 system and the EGI system based on EGI ELP files for the 256 channels.<br>> <br>> John<br>> <br>> ***********************************************<br>> John E. Richards Carolina Distinguished Professor<br>> Department of Psychology<br>> University of South Carolina<br>> Columbia, SC 29208<br>> Dept Phone: 803 777 2079<br>> Fax: 803 777 9558<br>> Email: richards-john@sc.edu<br>> HTTP: jerlab.psych.sc.edu<br>> ***********************************************<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> >----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> ><br>> >Message: 1<br>> >Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:35:00 +0100<br>> >From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> >To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> >Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> >Message-ID: <0c2e8c0fa08db25ba3bb87c130fe0d7f@mail.uni-kiel.de><br>> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> ><br>> > <br>> ><br>> >Dear community, <br>> ><br>> >My name is Laith Hamid and I am working in the University Medical<br>> >Complex of Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel on source analysis of epileptic<br>> >spikes and seizures. Currently I am analysing an EEG data set that was<br>> >recorded using a 256-channel EGI system and I wanted to ask whether you<br>> >have a standard BEM or FEM head model that extends enough downwards to<br>> >accomodate all 256 electrodes. The current standard BEM model in the<br>> >template folder of Fieldtrip isn't appropriate for source analysis of<br>> >256-channel EGI data. <br>> ><br>> >Thank you very much in advance for your help! <br>> ><br>> >Best, <br>> ><br>> >Laith<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:37:32 +0200<br>> From: saeed zahran <saeedzahran@hotmail.com><br>> To: "fieldtrip@science.ru.nl" <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> Message-ID: <DUB125-W5597106FD75ADF3E7BD054B7C20@phx.gbl><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> Dear Fieldtrip community,<br>> <br>> I define the volume conductor as:<br>> <br>> vol = [];<br>> vol.bnd(1).pnt=skinpnt<br>> vol.bnd(1).tri=skinf<br>> <br>> vol.bnd(2).pnt=uteruspnt<br>> vol.bnd(2).tri=uterusf<br>> <br>> vol.bnd(3).pnt=uterinecontentpnt<br>> vol.bnd(3).tri=uterinecontentf<br>> <br>> vol.cond = c;<br>> <br>> <br>> But it result with the below error:<br>> <br>> Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals.<br>> <br>> Error in triangle4pt (line 57)<br>> sph_pnt = pnt([tri(jj,:) lv],:);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_headmodel_bemcp (line 101)<br>> vol = triangle4pt(vol);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_prepare_headmodel (line 253)<br>> vol = ft_headmodel_bemcp(geometry, 'conductivity', cfg.conductivity);<br>> <br>> Error in openmeeg_eeg_leadfield_example_me (line 91)<br>> vol = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, vol);<br>> <br>> <br>> Thank you very much in advance for your help! <br>> <br>> Best regards<br>> Saeed Zahran<br>> <br>> > From: fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<br>> > Subject: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:00:02 +0100<br>> > <br>> > Send fieldtrip mailing list submissions to<br>> > fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> > <br>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> > fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<br>> > <br>> > You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> > fieldtrip-owner@science.ru.nl<br>> > <br>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> > than "Re: Contents of fieldtrip digest..."<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Today's Topics:<br>> > <br>> > 1. Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> > 2. Re: Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Cristiano Micheli)<br>> > 3. Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> > 4. Source Localisation (aishwarya selvaraj)<br>> > 5. Re: Source Localisation (Hom?lle)<br>> > 6. Re: plotting neighbours (victoria schroeder)<br>> > 7. Re: Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Cristiano Micheli)<br>> > 8. Re: Source Localisation (Munsif Jatoi)<br>> > 9. problems with mri interpolation (Olga Sysoeva)<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 1<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:35:00 +0100<br>> > From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID: <0c2e8c0fa08db25ba3bb87c130fe0d7f@mail.uni-kiel.de><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Dear community, <br>> > <br>> > My name is Laith Hamid and I am working in the University Medical<br>> > Complex of Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel on source analysis of epileptic<br>> > spikes and seizures. Currently I am analysing an EEG data set that was<br>> > recorded using a 256-channel EGI system and I wanted to ask whether you<br>> > have a standard BEM or FEM head Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals.<br>> <br>> Error in triangle4pt (line 57)<br>> sph_pnt = pnt([tri(jj,:) lv],:);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_headmodel_bemcp (line 101)<br>> vol = triangle4pt(vol);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_prepare_headmodel (line 253)<br>> vol = ft_headmodel_bemcp(geometry, 'conductivity', cfg.conductivity);<br>> <br>> Error in openmeeg_eeg_leadfield_example_me (line 91)<br>> vol = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, vol);<br>> model that extends enough downwards to<br>> > accomodate all 256 electrodes. The current standard BEM model in the<br>> > template folder of Fieldtrip isn't appropriate for source analysis of<br>> > 256-channel EGI data. <br>> > <br>> > Thank you very much in advance for your help! <br>> > <br>> > Best, <br>> > <br>> > Laith <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/f8805c11/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 2<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:16:54 +0100<br>> > From: Cristiano Micheli <michelic72@gmail.com><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADW7XCCywrPeWqGTqfP6jWoeLuvBo52poPfRyAPy9__VvkbDLg@mail.gmail.com><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> > <br>> > Dear Laith,<br>> > <br>> > thanks for your question. You could refer to a factory schematic layout<br>> > such as the one in figure 4 of this publication:<br>> > http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00159/abstract<br>> > <br>> > and subsequently use the function ft_prepare_layout to manually track the<br>> > points of the custom design on your own (if you dont want to wait for<br>> > somebody from the FT to do the same for you).<br>> > <br>> > cfg = [];<br>> > cfg.image = 'figure4_layout_256_Frontiers.png';<br>> > lay = ft_prepare_layout(cfg);<br>> > <br>> > The following tutorial describes the procedure in more details:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/layout<br>> > <br>> > Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me for this and other matters.<br>> > <br>> > All the best<br>> > Cris Micheli<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> > wrote:<br>> > <br>> > > Dear community,<br>> > ><br>> > > My name is Laith Hamid and I am working in the University Medical Complex<br>> > > of Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel on source analysis of epileptic spikes and<br>> > > seizures. Currently I am analysing an EEG data set that was recorded using<br>> > > a 256-channel EGI system and I wanted to ask whether you have a standard<br>> > > BEM or FEM head model that extends enough downwards to accomodate all 256<br>> > > electrodes. The current standard BEM model in the template folder of<br>> > > Fieldtrip isn't appropriate for source analysis of 256-channel EGI data.<br>> > ><br>> > > Thank you very much in advance for your help!<br>> > ><br>> > > Best,<br>> > ><br>> > > Laith<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/659988fa/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 3<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:41:48 +0100<br>> > From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> > To: Fieldtrip <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID: <61e8cefadba890a26ecd0b9adf0bca9b@mail.uni-kiel.de><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Dear Cris,<br>> > <br>> > thank you very much for your answer. I am refering to an issue that was<br>> > discussed in this thread from April 2013: <br>> > <br>> > [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI <br>> > <br>> > The thread however does not offer a segmentation or head model for<br>> > download. Some electrodes in the EGI 256-electrodes cap are placed on<br>> > the cheeks or on the back of the neck and these areas are not modeled by<br>> > the standard BEM skin compartment in the standard BEM model. My question<br>> > was about a standard segmentation that extends the skin (and skull)<br>> > compartment downwards to allow these electrodes to sit on the nodes of<br>> > the skin mesh.<br>> > <br>> > Best,<br>> > Laith <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/49665b0c/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 4<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:52:55 +0000<br>> > From: aishwarya selvaraj <aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com><br>> > To: "fieldtrip, donders" <fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID: <3ff5de7a69704e8d9e873e3f94120ad7@EXPRD01.hosting.ru.nl><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> > <br>> > Hi guys,<br>> > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > Im very new to it .<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > It would be of great help .<br>> > <br>> > --<br>> > Regards,<br>> > Aishwarya<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/3459ed12/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 5<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:06:13 +0000<br>> > From: Hom?lle, S. (Simon) <S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <2247A6E8AF3DB04AAB11BDDD86B72F830335254E@exprd01.hosting.ru.nl><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> > <br>> > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> > <br>> > Under http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial there are several tutorials about source reconstruction.<br>> > <br>> > My recommended start would be:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Hopefully this provides you good start working with EEG source reconstruction<br>> > <br>> > Best regards,<br>> > <br>> > Simon Hom?lle<br>> > PhD Candidate<br>> > Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour<br>> > Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging<br>> > Radboud University Nijmegen<br>> > Phone: +31-(0)24-36-65059<br>> > ________________________________<br>> > From: fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl [fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl] on behalf of aishwarya selvaraj [aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com]<br>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 5:52 PM<br>> > To: fieldtrip, donders<br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > <br>> > Hi guys,<br>> > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > Im very new to it .<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > It would be of great help .<br>> > <br>> > --<br>> > Regards,<br>> > Aishwarya<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/d2425227/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 6<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:49:21 +0000<br>> > From: victoria schroeder <vic.schroeder2@gmail.com><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] plotting neighbours<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CAOWWpozcLgcLNqgF4rMrTRZ_=e8cYCvXgeY5ZJYXx_9YmWnJ_w@mail.gmail.com><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> > <br>> > Thank you very much Philipp and Tzvetan!<br>> > <br>> > Things have become much clearer now.<br>> > <br>> > I would like to follow up with a very related question. I am trying to<br>> > replicate the analysis for the cluster based permutation test using the<br>> > code and the data provided. However, i run into two problems here<br>> > <br>> > First, i get the following error if i use the original code:<br>> > Attempted to access cfg.frequency(2); index out of bounds because<br>> > numel(cfg.frequency)=1.<br>> > <br>> > Error in ft_freqstatistics (line 187)<br>> > cfg.frequency = [max(cfg.frequency(1), fmin), min(cfg.frequency(2), fmax)];<br>> > <br>> > Therefore , i change the input cfg.frequency=20 to cfg.frequency=[20 20].<br>> > However, then no significant clusters are found. Which becomes clear when<br>> > trying to plot the cluster or by looking at the output of<br>> > ft_freqstatistics.<br>> > <br>> > Does the change in the code , change the output? How can i avoid the error<br>> > mentioned above and still get the same output from ft_freqstatistics as the<br>> > one provided on the webpage?<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > The relevant section of the toturial is provided below.<br>> > Thank you!<br>> > <br>> > Victoria<br>> > <br>> > Permutation test<br>> > <br>> > Now, run *ft_freqstatistics<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/reference/ft_freqstatistics>* to compare<br>> > freqFIC_planar_cmb and freqFC_planar_cmb. Except for the field cfg.latency,<br>> > the following configuration is identical to the configuration that was used<br>> > for comparing event-related averages in the cluster-based permutation tests<br>> > on event related fields tutorial<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/cluster_permutation_timelock>.<br>> > Also see this tutorial<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/cluster_permutation_timelock> for<br>> > a detailed explanation of all the configuration settings. You can read more<br>> > about the *ft_prepare_neighbours<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/reference/ft_prepare_neighbours>* function<br>> > in the FAQ's<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/faq/how_does_ft_prepare_neighbours_work>.<br>> > <br>> > To load the planar gradient TFRs (also available on the FieldTrip FTP<br>> > servers,freqFIC_planar_cmb.mat<br>> > <ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/cluster_permutation_freq/freqFIC_planar_cmb.mat><br>> > and freqFC_planar_cmb.mat<br>> > <ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/cluster_permutation_freq/freqFC_planar_cmb.mat>),<br>> > use:<br>> > <br>> > load freqFIC_planar_cmb<br>> > load freqFC_planar_cmb<br>> > <br>> > cfg = [];<br>> > cfg.channel = {'MEG', '-MLP31', '-MLO12'};<br>> > cfg.latency = 'all';<br>> > cfg.frequency = 20;<br>> > cfg.method = 'montecarlo';<br>> > cfg.statistic = 'ft_statfun_indepsamplesT';<br>> > cfg.correctm = 'cluster';<br>> > cfg.clusteralpha = 0.05;<br>> > cfg.clusterstatistic = 'maxsum';<br>> > cfg.minnbchan = 2;<br>> > cfg.tail = 0;<br>> > cfg.clustertail = 0;<br>> > cfg.alpha = 0.025;<br>> > cfg.numrandomization = 500;<br>> > % prepare_neighbours determines what sensors may form clusters<br>> > cfg_neighb.method = 'distance';<br>> > cfg.neighbours = ft_prepare_neighbours(cfg_neighb, dataFC);<br>> > <br>> > design = zeros(1,size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1) +<br>> > size(freqFC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1));<br>> > design(1,1:size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)) = 1;<br>> > design(1,(size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)+1):(size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)+...<br>> > size(freqFC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1))) = 2;<br>> > <br>> > cfg.design = design;<br>> > cfg.ivar = 1;<br>> > <br>> > [stat] = ft_freqstatistics(cfg, freqFIC_planar_cmb, freqFC_planar_cmb);<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > 2016-01-18 17:57 GMT+00:00 Tzvetan Popov <tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de>:<br>> > <br>> > ><br>> > > Hi Victoria,<br>> > ><br>> > > oopsy, I think I confused you dramatically. I?m sorry for this. You are<br>> > > right I was only scrolling up to the part where the mags were analyzed. As<br>> > > for combining the MEG*2 and MEG*3 I was wrong there too. Of course you can<br>> > > threat them separately, as I was naively thinking as non-neuormag user, but<br>> > > indeed combination of both is recommended as I have now learned :-)(thanks<br>> > > Phillip). I ran the following steps and I guess this should work for you.<br>> > > best<br>> > > tzvetan<br>> > ><br>> > > %%<br>> > > cfg = [];<br>> > > ComCon = ft_combineplanar(cfg,FreqCon);<br>> > > %%<br>> > > cfg = []<br>> > > cfg.method = 'triangulation';<br>> > > cfg.layout = 'neuromag306cmb.lay';<br>> > > cfg.senstype = 'MEG';<br>> > > neighbours = ft_prepare_neighbours(cfg, ComCon)<br>> > > %%<br>> > > % plot neighbours<br>> > > cfg=[];<br>> > > cfg.neighbours = neighbours;<br>> > > cfg.layout = 'neuromag306cmb.lay';<br>> > > ft_neighbourplot(cfg);<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/de08d8f1/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 7<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:50:24 +0100<br>> > From: Cristiano Micheli <michelic72@gmail.com><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADW7XCC8BvdVKRAEMw4Jt8v3T6zXjF2zHF_T_4h8ZkuvTbc=1Q@mail.gmail.com><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> > <br>> > Dear Laith,<br>> > <br>> > this might be possible if you have the subject-specific MRI by following<br>> > the tutorial here:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> > <br>> > and using the function ft_prepare_mesh and the tutorial command:<br>> > <br>> > cfg=[];<br>> > cfg.tissue={'brain','skull','scalp'};<br>> > cfg.numvertices = [3000 2000 1000];<br>> > bnd=ft_prepare_mesh(cfg,segmentedmri);<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > which uses the segmented MRI (see tutorial). The bnd(3) variable should<br>> > contain your triangulated surface with 1000 vertices. Let me know if that<br>> > works. Of course you should see the skin and the neck in the original MRI.<br>> > <br>> > If you do not have an anatomical MRI that extends down to the chin you<br>> > could try with a template, such as this:<br>> > ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/beamformer_extended/subjectK.mri<br>> > and the corresponding segmented version<br>> > ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/beamformer_extended/segmentedmri.mat<br>> > <br>> > This goes down to the chin. Then you take care of rearranging the position<br>> > of the EEG electrodes according to this:<br>> > <br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/example/align_eeg_electrode_positions_to_bem_headmodel<br>> > <br>> > I hope this helped<br>> > Cris<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de><br>> > wrote:<br>> > <br>> > > Dear Cris,<br>> > ><br>> > > thank you very much for your answer. I am refering to an issue that was<br>> > > discussed in this thread from April 2013:<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > The thread however does not offer a segmentation or head model for<br>> > > download. Some electrodes in the EGI 256-electrodes cap are placed on the<br>> > > cheeks or on the back of the neck and these areas are not modeled by the<br>> > > standard BEM skin compartment in the standard BEM model. My question was<br>> > > about a standard segmentation that extends the skin (and skull) compartment<br>> > > downwards to allow these electrodes to sit on the nodes of the skin mesh.<br>> > ><br>> > > Best,<br>> > > Laith<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/0e42f0b5/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 8<br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:17:12 +0800<br>> > From: Munsif Jatoi <munsif.jatoi@gmail.com><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CAHnJ=SUHe84yNDVnTLKhGdJBri0mvOdbU0rPqM-Z3-0Gv71Ycg@mail.gmail.com><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> > <br>> > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> > <br>> > Please refer to main help tutorials.<br>> > <br>> > Also, you can find out the survey papers written in this area. For more,<br>> > SPM website can provide good help.<br>> > <br>> > Best,<br>> > Munsif.<br>> > <br>> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Hom?lle, S. (Simon) <<br>> > S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl> wrote:<br>> > <br>> > > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> > ><br>> > > Under http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial there are several<br>> > > tutorials about source reconstruction.<br>> > ><br>> > > My recommended start would be:<br>> > > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> > > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Hopefully this provides you good start working with EEG source<br>> > > reconstruction<br>> > ><br>> > > Best regards,<br>> > ><br>> > > Simon Hom?lle<br>> > > PhD Candidate<br>> > > Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour<br>> > > Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging<br>> > > Radboud University Nijmegen<br>> > > Phone: +31-(0)24-36-65059<br>> > > ------------------------------<br>> > > *From:* fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl [fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl]<br>> > > on behalf of aishwarya selvaraj [aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com]<br>> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 5:52 PM<br>> > > *To:* fieldtrip, donders<br>> > > *Subject:* [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > ><br>> > > Hi guys,<br>> > > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > > Im very new to it .<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > > It would be of great help .<br>> > ><br>> > > --<br>> > > Regards,<br>> > > Aishwarya<br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > -- <br>> > Munsif Ali H.Jatoi,<br>> > <br>> > Ph D Scholar,<br>> > Centre for Intelligent Signals and Imaging Research,<br>> > Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS,<br>> > Malaysia.<br>> > <br>> > http://scholar.google.com.my/citations?user=Y6g6jOAAAAAJ&hl=en<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/4f6391e8/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > Message: 9<br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:36:16 +0300<br>> > From: Olga Sysoeva <olga.v.sysoeva@gmail.com><br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] problems with mri interpolation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADtsnVcJLhrPPfq-P1Htj-RmfgzDDgqNhr8vsAoJ2mxxCV7seQ@mail.gmail.com><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> > <br>> > Dear Fieldtrippers,<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > I'm encounter the problem with MRI interpolation and reslicing using<br>> > <br>> > FT_VOLUMERESLICE.<br>> > <br>> > I have read my MRI from fif.file and this mri variable contains<br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.unit, 'm'<br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.dim, [432, 512, 180]<br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.anatomy, <432, 512, 180 int16><br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.hdr, (1*1 structure)<br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.transform, (4*4 double)<br>> > <br>> > mri_K0012.coordsys 'neuromag'.<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Than I used<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > mri = ft_volumereslice([], mri);<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > the output is<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ?the input is volume data with dimensions [432<br>> > 512 180]<br>> > <br>> > reslicing from [432 512 180] to [256 256 256]<br>> > <br>> > the input is volume data with dimensions [256<br>> > 256 256]<br>> > <br>> > the input is volume data with dimensions [432<br>> > 512 180]<br>> > <br>> > selecting subvolume of 0.0%<br>> > <br>> > reslicing and interpolating anatomy<br>> > <br>> > interpolating<br>> > <br>> > ??? Attempted to access sel(1); index out of<br>> > bounds because numel(sel)=0.<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Error in ==> ft_sourceinterpolate>my_interpn<br>> > at 663<br>> > <br>> > ft_progress(sel(1)/num, 'interpolating<br>> > %.1f%%\n', 100*sel(1)/num);<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Error in ==> ft_sourceinterpolate at 583<br>> > <br>> > av( sel) = my_interpn(fv, ax(sel),<br>> > ay(sel), az(sel), cfg.interpmethod,<br>> > <br>> > cfg.feedback);<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Error in ==> ft_volumereslice at 176<br>> > <br>> > resliced = ft_sourceinterpolate(tmpcfg, mri,<br>> > resliced);?<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > I'm using matlab 7.6.0 (R2008a) and recently<br>> > downloaded fieltrip (also in my previous version of 2013 the error<br>> > was the same).<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > I'd be thankful for the comments.<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Best Regards,<br>> > <br>> > Olga.<br>> > <br>> > P.S.Actually, I can project my sources<br>> > meaningfully into not interpolated MRI, altoough the images are<br>> > plotted upside down.<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/653068d3/attachment-0001.html><br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > <br>> > End of fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> > *****************************************<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/0d8cf652/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 4<br>> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:16:55 +0000<br>> From: "Schoffelen, J.M. (Jan Mathijs)" <jan.schoffelen@donders.ru.nl><br>> To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> Message-ID: <BFFF5195-2F08-4233-B4D5-A0F8F69C17D7@fcdonders.ru.nl><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> Saeed,<br>> <br>> are you using 0 or 1 indexing for your triangles? You probably want to use 1 indexing.<br>> <br>> Best,<br>> Jan-Mathijs<br>> <br>> <br>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:37 PM, saeed zahran <saeedzahran@hotmail.com<mailto:saeedzahran@hotmail.com>> wrote:<br>> <br>> Dear Fieldtrip community,<br>> <br>> I define the volume conductor as:<br>> <br>> vol = [];<br>> vol.bnd(1).pnt=skinpnt<br>> vol.bnd(1).tri=skinf<br>> <br>> vol.bnd(2).pnt=uteruspnt<br>> vol.bnd(2).tri=uterusf<br>> <br>> vol.bnd(3).pnt=uterinecontentpnt<br>> vol.bnd(3).tri=uterinecontentf<br>> <br>> vol.cond = c;<br>> <br>> <br>> But it result with the below error:<br>> <br>> Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals.<br>> <br>> Error in triangle4pt (line 57)<br>> sph_pnt = pnt([tri(jj,:) lv],:);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_headmodel_bemcp (line 101)<br>> vol = triangle4pt(vol);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_prepare_headmodel (line 253)<br>> vol = ft_headmodel_bemcp(geometry, 'conductivity', cfg.conductivity);<br>> <br>> Error in openmeeg_eeg_leadfield_example_me (line 91)<br>> vol = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, vol);<br>> <br>> <br>> Thank you very much in advance for your help!<br>> <br>> Best regards<br>> Saeed Zahran<br>> <br>> > From: fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:00:02 +0100<br>> ><br>> > Send fieldtrip mailing list submissions to<br>> > fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> ><br>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> > fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-request@science.ru.nl><br>> ><br>> > You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> > fieldtrip-owner@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-owner@science.ru.nl><br>> ><br>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> > than "Re: Contents of fieldtrip digest..."<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Today's Topics:<br>> ><br>> > 1. Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> > 2. Re: Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Cristiano Micheli)<br>> > 3. Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Laith Hamid)<br>> > 4. Source Localisation (aishwarya selvaraj)<br>> > 5. Re: Source Localisation (Hom?lle)<br>> > 6. Re: plotting neighbours (victoria schroeder)<br>> > 7. Re: Standard BEM or FEM models for use with 256-electrode EEG<br>> > data recorded with EGI caps (Cristiano Micheli)<br>> > 8. Re: Source Localisation (Munsif Jatoi)<br>> > 9. problems with mri interpolation (Olga Sysoeva)<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 1<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:35:00 +0100<br>> > From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de<mailto:lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID: <0c2e8c0fa08db25ba3bb87c130fe0d7f@mail.uni-kiel.de<mailto:0c2e8c0fa08db25ba3bb87c130fe0d7f@mail.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Dear community,<br>> ><br>> > My name is Laith Hamid and I am working in the University Medical<br>> > Complex of Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel on source analysis of epileptic<br>> > spikes and seizures. Currently I am analysing an EEG data set that was<br>> > recorded using a 256-channel EGI system and I wanted to ask whether you<br>> > have a standard BEM or FEM head Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals.<br>> <br>> Error in triangle4pt (line 57)<br>> sph_pnt = pnt([tri(jj,:) lv],:);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_headmodel_bemcp (line 101)<br>> vol = triangle4pt(vol);<br>> <br>> Error in ft_prepare_headmodel (line 253)<br>> vol = ft_headmodel_bemcp(geometry, 'conductivity', cfg.conductivity);<br>> <br>> Error in openmeeg_eeg_leadfield_example_me (line 91)<br>> vol = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, vol);<br>> model that extends enough downwards to<br>> > accomodate all 256 electrodes. The current standard BEM model in the<br>> > template folder of Fieldtrip isn't appropriate for source analysis of<br>> > 256-channel EGI data.<br>> ><br>> > Thank you very much in advance for your help!<br>> ><br>> > Best,<br>> ><br>> > Laith<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/f8805c11/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 2<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:16:54 +0100<br>> > From: Cristiano Micheli <michelic72@gmail.com<mailto:michelic72@gmail.com>><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADW7XCCywrPeWqGTqfP6jWoeLuvBo52poPfRyAPy9__VvkbDLg@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CADW7XCCywrPeWqGTqfP6jWoeLuvBo52poPfRyAPy9__VvkbDLg@mail.gmail.com>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> ><br>> > Dear Laith,<br>> ><br>> > thanks for your question. You could refer to a factory schematic layout<br>> > such as the one in figure 4 of this publication:<br>> > http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00159/abstract<br>> ><br>> > and subsequently use the function ft_prepare_layout to manually track the<br>> > points of the custom design on your own (if you dont want to wait for<br>> > somebody from the FT to do the same for you).<br>> ><br>> > cfg = [];<br>> > cfg.image = 'figure4_layout_256_Frontiers.png';<br>> > lay = ft_prepare_layout(cfg);<br>> ><br>> > The following tutorial describes the procedure in more details:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/layout<br>> ><br>> > Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me for this and other matters.<br>> ><br>> > All the best<br>> > Cris Micheli<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de<mailto:lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > wrote:<br>> ><br>> > > Dear community,<br>> > ><br>> > > My name is Laith Hamid and I am working in the University Medical Complex<br>> > > of Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel on source analysis of epileptic spikes and<br>> > > seizures. Currently I am analysing an EEG data set that was recorded using<br>> > > a 256-channel EGI system and I wanted to ask whether you have a standard<br>> > > BEM or FEM head model that extends enough downwards to accomodate all 256<br>> > > electrodes. The current standard BEM model in the template folder of<br>> > > Fieldtrip isn't appropriate for source analysis of 256-channel EGI data.<br>> > ><br>> > > Thank you very much in advance for your help!<br>> > ><br>> > > Best,<br>> > ><br>> > > Laith<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/659988fa/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 3<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:41:48 +0100<br>> > From: Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de<mailto:lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > To: Fieldtrip <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID: <61e8cefadba890a26ecd0b9adf0bca9b@mail.uni-kiel.de<mailto:61e8cefadba890a26ecd0b9adf0bca9b@mail.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Dear Cris,<br>> ><br>> > thank you very much for your answer. I am refering to an issue that was<br>> > discussed in this thread from April 2013:<br>> ><br>> > [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI<br>> ><br>> > The thread however does not offer a segmentation or head model for<br>> > download. Some electrodes in the EGI 256-electrodes cap are placed on<br>> > the cheeks or on the back of the neck and these areas are not modeled by<br>> > the standard BEM skin compartment in the standard BEM model. My question<br>> > was about a standard segmentation that extends the skin (and skull)<br>> > compartment downwards to allow these electrodes to sit on the nodes of<br>> > the skin mesh.<br>> ><br>> > Best,<br>> > Laith<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/49665b0c/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 4<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:52:55 +0000<br>> > From: aishwarya selvaraj <aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com<mailto:aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com>><br>> > To: "fieldtrip, donders" <fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID: <3ff5de7a69704e8d9e873e3f94120ad7@EXPRD01.hosting.ru.nl<mailto:3ff5de7a69704e8d9e873e3f94120ad7@EXPRD01.hosting.ru.nl>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> ><br>> > Hi guys,<br>> > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > Im very new to it .<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > It would be of great help .<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Regards,<br>> > Aishwarya<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/3459ed12/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 5<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:06:13 +0000<br>> > From: Hom?lle, S. (Simon) <S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl<mailto:S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl>><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <2247A6E8AF3DB04AAB11BDDD86B72F830335254E@exprd01.hosting.ru.nl<mailto:2247A6E8AF3DB04AAB11BDDD86B72F830335254E@exprd01.hosting.ru.nl>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> ><br>> > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> ><br>> > Under http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial there are several tutorials about source reconstruction.<br>> ><br>> > My recommended start would be:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Hopefully this provides you good start working with EEG source reconstruction<br>> ><br>> > Best regards,<br>> ><br>> > Simon Hom?lle<br>> > PhD Candidate<br>> > Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour<br>> > Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging<br>> > Radboud University Nijmegen<br>> > Phone: +31-(0)24-36-65059<br>> > ________________________________<br>> > From: fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl> [fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl>] on behalf of aishwarya selvaraj [aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com<mailto:aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com>]<br>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 5:52 PM<br>> > To: fieldtrip, donders<br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> ><br>> > Hi guys,<br>> > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > Im very new to it .<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > It would be of great help .<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Regards,<br>> > Aishwarya<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/d2425227/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 6<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:49:21 +0000<br>> > From: victoria schroeder <vic.schroeder2@gmail.com<mailto:vic.schroeder2@gmail.com>><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] plotting neighbours<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CAOWWpozcLgcLNqgF4rMrTRZ_=e8cYCvXgeY5ZJYXx_9YmWnJ_w@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAOWWpozcLgcLNqgF4rMrTRZ_=e8cYCvXgeY5ZJYXx_9YmWnJ_w@mail.gmail.com>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> ><br>> > Thank you very much Philipp and Tzvetan!<br>> ><br>> > Things have become much clearer now.<br>> ><br>> > I would like to follow up with a very related question. I am trying to<br>> > replicate the analysis for the cluster based permutation test using the<br>> > code and the data provided. However, i run into two problems here<br>> ><br>> > First, i get the following error if i use the original code:<br>> > Attempted to access cfg.frequency(2); index out of bounds because<br>> > numel(cfg.frequency)=1.<br>> ><br>> > Error in ft_freqstatistics (line 187)<br>> > cfg.frequency = [max(cfg.frequency(1), fmin), min(cfg.frequency(2), fmax)];<br>> ><br>> > Therefore , i change the input cfg.frequency=20 to cfg.frequency=[20 20].<br>> > However, then no significant clusters are found. Which becomes clear when<br>> > trying to plot the cluster or by looking at the output of<br>> > ft_freqstatistics.<br>> ><br>> > Does the change in the code , change the output? How can i avoid the error<br>> > mentioned above and still get the same output from ft_freqstatistics as the<br>> > one provided on the webpage?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > The relevant section of the toturial is provided below.<br>> > Thank you!<br>> ><br>> > Victoria<br>> ><br>> > Permutation test<br>> ><br>> > Now, run *ft_freqstatistics<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/reference/ft_freqstatistics>* to compare<br>> > freqFIC_planar_cmb and freqFC_planar_cmb. Except for the field cfg.latency,<br>> > the following configuration is identical to the configuration that was used<br>> > for comparing event-related averages in the cluster-based permutation tests<br>> > on event related fields tutorial<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/cluster_permutation_timelock>.<br>> > Also see this tutorial<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/cluster_permutation_timelock> for<br>> > a detailed explanation of all the configuration settings. You can read more<br>> > about the *ft_prepare_neighbours<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/reference/ft_prepare_neighbours>* function<br>> > in the FAQ's<br>> > <http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/faq/how_does_ft_prepare_neighbours_work>.<br>> ><br>> > To load the planar gradient TFRs (also available on the FieldTrip FTP<br>> > servers,freqFIC_planar_cmb.mat<br>> > <ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/cluster_permutation_freq/freqFIC_planar_cmb.mat><br>> > and freqFC_planar_cmb.mat<br>> > <ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/cluster_permutation_freq/freqFC_planar_cmb.mat>),<br>> > use:<br>> ><br>> > load freqFIC_planar_cmb<br>> > load freqFC_planar_cmb<br>> ><br>> > cfg = [];<br>> > cfg.channel = {'MEG', '-MLP31', '-MLO12'};<br>> > cfg.latency = 'all';<br>> > cfg.frequency = 20;<br>> > cfg.method = 'montecarlo';<br>> > cfg.statistic = 'ft_statfun_indepsamplesT';<br>> > cfg.correctm = 'cluster';<br>> > cfg.clusteralpha = 0.05;<br>> > cfg.clusterstatistic = 'maxsum';<br>> > cfg.minnbchan = 2;<br>> > cfg.tail = 0;<br>> > cfg.clustertail = 0;<br>> > cfg.alpha = 0.025;<br>> > cfg.numrandomization = 500;<br>> > % prepare_neighbours determines what sensors may form clusters<br>> > cfg_neighb.method = 'distance';<br>> > cfg.neighbours = ft_prepare_neighbours(cfg_neighb, dataFC);<br>> ><br>> > design = zeros(1,size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1) +<br>> > size(freqFC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1));<br>> > design(1,1:size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)) = 1;<br>> > design(1,(size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)+1):(size(freqFIC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1)+...<br>> > size(freqFC_planar_cmb.powspctrm,1))) = 2;<br>> ><br>> > cfg.design = design;<br>> > cfg.ivar = 1;<br>> ><br>> > [stat] = ft_freqstatistics(cfg, freqFIC_planar_cmb, freqFC_planar_cmb);<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > 2016-01-18 17:57 GMT+00:00 Tzvetan Popov <tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de<mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de>>:<br>> ><br>> > ><br>> > > Hi Victoria,<br>> > ><br>> > > oopsy, I think I confused you dramatically. I?m sorry for this. You are<br>> > > right I was only scrolling up to the part where the mags were analyzed. As<br>> > > for combining the MEG*2 and MEG*3 I was wrong there too. Of course you can<br>> > > threat them separately, as I was naively thinking as non-neuormag user, but<br>> > > indeed combination of both is recommended as I have now learned :-)(thanks<br>> > > Phillip). I ran the following steps and I guess this should work for you.<br>> > > best<br>> > > tzvetan<br>> > ><br>> > > %%<br>> > > cfg = [];<br>> > > ComCon = ft_combineplanar(cfg,FreqCon);<br>> > > %%<br>> > > cfg = []<br>> > > cfg.method = 'triangulation';<br>> > > cfg.layout = 'neuromag306cmb.lay';<br>> > > cfg.senstype = 'MEG';<br>> > > neighbours = ft_prepare_neighbours(cfg, ComCon)<br>> > > %%<br>> > > % plot neighbours<br>> > > cfg=[];<br>> > > cfg.neighbours = neighbours;<br>> > > cfg.layout = 'neuromag306cmb.lay';<br>> > > ft_neighbourplot(cfg);<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/de08d8f1/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 7<br>> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:50:24 +0100<br>> > From: Cristiano Micheli <michelic72@gmail.com<mailto:michelic72@gmail.com>><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Standard BEM or FEM models for use with<br>> > 256-electrode EEG data recorded with EGI caps<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADW7XCC8BvdVKRAEMw4Jt8v3T6zXjF2zHF_T_4h8ZkuvTbc=1Q@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CADW7XCC8BvdVKRAEMw4Jt8v3T6zXjF2zHF_T_4h8ZkuvTbc=1Q@mail.gmail.com>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> ><br>> > Dear Laith,<br>> ><br>> > this might be possible if you have the subject-specific MRI by following<br>> > the tutorial here:<br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> ><br>> > and using the function ft_prepare_mesh and the tutorial command:<br>> ><br>> > cfg=[];<br>> > cfg.tissue={'brain','skull','scalp'};<br>> > cfg.numvertices = [3000 2000 1000];<br>> > bnd=ft_prepare_mesh(cfg,segmentedmri);<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > which uses the segmented MRI (see tutorial). The bnd(3) variable should<br>> > contain your triangulated surface with 1000 vertices. Let me know if that<br>> > works. Of course you should see the skin and the neck in the original MRI.<br>> ><br>> > If you do not have an anatomical MRI that extends down to the chin you<br>> > could try with a template, such as this:<br>> > ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/beamformer_extended/subjectK.mri<br>> > and the corresponding segmented version<br>> > ftp://ftp.fieldtriptoolbox.org/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/beamformer_extended/segmentedmri.mat<br>> ><br>> > This goes down to the chin. Then you take care of rearranging the position<br>> > of the EEG electrodes according to this:<br>> ><br>> > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/example/align_eeg_electrode_positions_to_bem_headmodel<br>> ><br>> > I hope this helped<br>> > Cris<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Laith Hamid <lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de<mailto:lah@pedneuro.uni-kiel.de>><br>> > wrote:<br>> ><br>> > > Dear Cris,<br>> > ><br>> > > thank you very much for your answer. I am refering to an issue that was<br>> > > discussed in this thread from April 2013:<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > The thread however does not offer a segmentation or head model for<br>> > > download. Some electrodes in the EGI 256-electrodes cap are placed on the<br>> > > cheeks or on the back of the neck and these areas are not modeled by the<br>> > > standard BEM skin compartment in the standard BEM model. My question was<br>> > > about a standard segmentation that extends the skin (and skull) compartment<br>> > > downwards to allow these electrodes to sit on the nodes of the skin mesh.<br>> > ><br>> > > Best,<br>> > > Laith<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160119/0e42f0b5/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 8<br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:17:12 +0800<br>> > From: Munsif Jatoi <munsif.jatoi@gmail.com<mailto:munsif.jatoi@gmail.com>><br>> > To: FieldTrip discussion list <fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl>><br>> > Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CAHnJ=SUHe84yNDVnTLKhGdJBri0mvOdbU0rPqM-Z3-0Gv71Ycg@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAHnJ=SUHe84yNDVnTLKhGdJBri0mvOdbU0rPqM-Z3-0Gv71Ycg@mail.gmail.com>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> ><br>> > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> ><br>> > Please refer to main help tutorials.<br>> ><br>> > Also, you can find out the survey papers written in this area. For more,<br>> > SPM website can provide good help.<br>> ><br>> > Best,<br>> > Munsif.<br>> ><br>> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Hom?lle, S. (Simon) <<br>> > S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl<mailto:S.Homolle@donders.ru.nl>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > > Dear Aishwarya,<br>> > ><br>> > > Under http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial there are several<br>> > > tutorials about source reconstruction.<br>> > ><br>> > > My recommended start would be:<br>> > > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/headmodel_eeg_bem<br>> > > http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/tutorial/minimumnormestimate<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Hopefully this provides you good start working with EEG source<br>> > > reconstruction<br>> > ><br>> > > Best regards,<br>> > ><br>> > > Simon Hom?lle<br>> > > PhD Candidate<br>> > > Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour<br>> > > Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging<br>> > > Radboud University Nijmegen<br>> > > Phone: +31-(0)24-36-65059<br>> > > ------------------------------<br>> > > *From:* fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl> [fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl>]<br>> > > on behalf of aishwarya selvaraj [aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com<mailto:aishwaryaselvaraj1708@gmail.com>]<br>> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 5:52 PM<br>> > > *To:* fieldtrip, donders<br>> > > *Subject:* [FieldTrip] Source Localisation<br>> > ><br>> > > Hi guys,<br>> > > I'm currently working on source localization of EEG signals .<br>> > > Im very new to it .<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > Can Anyone provide any inputs ??<br>> > > It would be of great help .<br>> > ><br>> > > --<br>> > > Regards,<br>> > > Aishwarya<br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> > ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Munsif Ali H.Jatoi,<br>> ><br>> > Ph D Scholar,<br>> > Centre for Intelligent Signals and Imaging Research,<br>> > Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS,<br>> > Malaysia.<br>> ><br>> > http://scholar.google.com.my/citations?user=Y6g6jOAAAAAJ&hl=en<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/4f6391e8/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > Message: 9<br>> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:36:16 +0300<br>> > From: Olga Sysoeva <olga.v.sysoeva@gmail.com<mailto:olga.v.sysoeva@gmail.com>><br>> > To: fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl><br>> > Subject: [FieldTrip] problems with mri interpolation<br>> > Message-ID:<br>> > <CADtsnVcJLhrPPfq-P1Htj-RmfgzDDgqNhr8vsAoJ2mxxCV7seQ@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CADtsnVcJLhrPPfq-P1Htj-RmfgzDDgqNhr8vsAoJ2mxxCV7seQ@mail.gmail.com>><br>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> ><br>> > Dear Fieldtrippers,<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I'm encounter the problem with MRI interpolation and reslicing using<br>> ><br>> > FT_VOLUMERESLICE.<br>> ><br>> > I have read my MRI from fif.file and this mri variable contains<br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.unit, 'm'<br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.dim, [432, 512, 180]<br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.anatomy, <432, 512, 180 int16><br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.hdr, (1*1 structure)<br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.transform, (4*4 double)<br>> ><br>> > mri_K0012.coordsys 'neuromag'.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Than I used<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > mri = ft_volumereslice([], mri);<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > the output is<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > ?the input is volume data with dimensions [432<br>> > 512 180]<br>> ><br>> > reslicing from [432 512 180] to [256 256 256]<br>> ><br>> > the input is volume data with dimensions [256<br>> > 256 256]<br>> ><br>> > the input is volume data with dimensions [432<br>> > 512 180]<br>> ><br>> > selecting subvolume of 0.0%<br>> ><br>> > reslicing and interpolating anatomy<br>> ><br>> > interpolating<br>> ><br>> > ??? Attempted to access sel(1); index out of<br>> > bounds because numel(sel)=0.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Error in ==> ft_sourceinterpolate>my_interpn<br>> > at 663<br>> ><br>> > ft_progress(sel(1)/num, 'interpolating<br>> > %.1f%%\n', 100*sel(1)/num);<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Error in ==> ft_sourceinterpolate at 583<br>> ><br>> > av( sel) = my_interpn(fv, ax(sel),<br>> > ay(sel), az(sel), cfg.interpmethod,<br>> ><br>> > cfg.feedback);<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Error in ==> ft_volumereslice at 176<br>> ><br>> > resliced = ft_sourceinterpolate(tmpcfg, mri,<br>> > resliced);?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I'm using matlab 7.6.0 (R2008a) and recently<br>> > downloaded fieltrip (also in my previous version of 2013 the error<br>> > was the same).<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I'd be thankful for the comments.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Best Regards,<br>> ><br>> > Olga.<br>> ><br>> > P.S.Actually, I can project my sources<br>> > meaningfully into not interpolated MRI, altoough the images are<br>> > plotted upside down.<br>> > -------------- next part --------------<br>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> > URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160120/653068d3/attachment-0001.html><br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > fieldtrip mailing list<br>> > fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> > http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> ><br>> > End of fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 18<br>> > *****************************************<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> fieldtrip mailing list<br>> fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl><br>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/attachments/20160121/d9124654/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> fieldtrip mailing list<br>> fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl<br>> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip<br>> <br>> End of fieldtrip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 19<br>> *****************************************<br></div> </div></body>
</html>