<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:"Consolas","serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Hi Ingrid,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I had similar issues with creating my own BEM as I too did not have the individual MRI’s nor the digitized electrode positions.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I created a BEM using the Curry (Neuroscan) software and imported in .mat format to use with Fieldtrip. However these are also based on the MNI template.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I am not sure whether this extends lower enough for your situation. I am attaching here a picture of my head model showing the skull and cortex with my registered
electrodes. If you are happy with it, I am more than happy to share it with you.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Please let me know.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Imali<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl
[mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Ingrid Nieuwenhuis<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 11 April 2013 4:22 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> fieldtrip@science.ru.nl<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<br>
<br>
Just had a brain wave, I'll share it for people with similar situation that might be interested in this thread. I think I should just get a random structural MRI that extends lower (includes ears and bit below), optimally of a subject with a head similar to
the MNI template. Make a BEM model (hmm, have to fix these errors I mentioned earlier then, well, should be doable on linux using dipoli). Then use ft_electroderealign to align the electrodes to this MRI, do the source analysis for all subjects using this
model, and subsequently use ft_volumenormalise to normalize to MNI template if I want to use any atlas functionality.<br>
<br>
If anyone did this already using FieldTrip and has a pre-made BEM (just like the standard_bem), would be really nice if you're willing to share :)
<br>
If not, I'll make my own, and people with low electrodes and no structural MRI and or no linux access can email me if they want to use it.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Ingrid<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Ingrid Nieuwenhuis PhD<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Postdoctoral Fellow<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Sleep and Neuroimaging Laboratory<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Department of Psychology<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>University of California, Berkeley<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>California 94720-1650<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Tolman Hall, room 5305<o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 4/10/2013 10:17 AM, Ingrid Nieuwenhuis wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Lilla and Imali,<br>
<br>
Thanks for your replies. In my case, the problem is not the aligning. My nasion electrode is on the nasion, and Cz is on Cz, everything is where it should be. The EGI 128 electrode net really has these low electrodes, which are there specifically to make source
analysis better by capturing more of the electric field. So I would have the best solution if I'd leave them there. However, in the model as derived from the MNI template, the skin part does not go down low enough.<br>
<br>
I looked at the picture after ft_prepare_vol_sens (see attachement, black is before, red is after), and indeed, this is not good. The low electrodes are squeezed up, and this will make source analysis worse. So I should indeed remove these electrodes (which
is a pity), or find a better MNI template.<br>
<br>
<b>So my question is:</b><br>
Does anyone know of a template in MNI space that extends more down? This template comes from SPM8, is there a version that extends lower? Or could I extend the skin roughly downwards with some triangular magic?<br>
<br>
I'm also a bit confused about the statement on this wiki page: <a href="http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/template/headmodel?s%5b%5d=standard&s%5b%5d=bem">
http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/template/headmodel?s[]=standard&s[]=bem</a><br>
under "revision information" header "skin" is says: "This skin surface is not used in the BEM model itself for computational reasons, but can be used for visualization."<br>
But this does not seem to be the case, since my electrode positions are modified based on till where the skin goes. So the skin surface does significantly influence the source analysis.
<br>
<br>
Anyway, thanks for all the help, and worse case, I just get rid of the low fellows.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Ingrid<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Ingrid Nieuwenhuis PhD<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Postdoctoral Fellow<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Sleep and Neuroimaging Laboratory<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Department of Psychology<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>University of California, Berkeley<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>California 94720-1650<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Tolman Hall, room 5305<o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 4/10/2013 9:05 AM, Magyari, Lilla wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">hi Ingrid and Imali, <br>
<br>
<br>
I think it is a really good question what to do in Ingrid's case. I do not know the "right" answer, but I would like to share my thoughts about it.
<br>
<br>
The ft_prepare_vol_sens is indeed projects the electrode positions closer to the headsurface as Imali wrote. But this function called automatically when you create your leadfield, so you do not have to do it separately (unless you want to visualize the corrected
electrode positions). <br>
<br>
However, I have been advised to rely on this projection carefully if electrode positions are far from the skin and specially, if the inaccuracies (distance from the skin) are not equally distributed across the electrodes, because that can cause a spatial bias.
<br>
<br>
Therefore, my question would be: why are those electrodes so low? Are those positions reflect the actual positions of the electrodes during the measurement? If yes, I would not change their positions, I would rather try to extend my headmodel e.g. by using
another template. (or another (but quite suboptimal) possibility is maybe to exclude those electrodes (and the data) from the analysis if they are anyway far from the brain.)
<br>
<br>
If the position of the electrodes should be higher up on the head, then instead of relying on projection, I would try first to scale the electrodes to fit them into the headsurface with the ft_electroderealign function.
<br>
<br>
I looked to the standard_bem file in the template directory, and I also load in the standard_1020.elc, and those electrodes perfectly fit the vol. So, it seems that the extension of the standard bem headsurface is suitable for the area which is covered by the
those template electrodes. And I do not know if the electrode set you use should cover a larger surface of the head, or if it should be just adjusted to the given headsurface.
<br>
<br>
Lilla <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
IMALI THANUJA HETTIARACHCHI wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Ingrid, <br>
<br>
I had a similar issue a few weeks ago, where my lower most electrodes <br>
started floating after electrode realign using the ft_electroderealign <br>
function. <br>
<br>
I used the ft_prepare_vol_sens as, <br>
[vol, elecR]=ft_prepare_vol_sens (col,elecR) and this did the trick and <br>
brought the electrodes on to the skin. <br>
<br>
Hope this helps...! <br>
<br>
Regards <br>
Imali <br>
<br>
<br>
*From:* <a href="mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl">fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl</a>
<br>
[<a href="mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl">fieldtrip-bounces@science.ru.nl</a>] on behalf of Ingrid Nieuwenhuis
<br>
[<a href="mailto:inieuwenhuis@berkeley.edu">inieuwenhuis@berkeley.edu</a>] <br>
*Sent:* Wednesday, 10 April 2013 9:29 AM <br>
*To:* <a href="mailto:fieldtrip@science.ru.nl">fieldtrip@science.ru.nl</a> <br>
*Subject:* Re: [FieldTrip] source analysis EEG data without MRI <br>
<br>
Hi all, <br>
<br>
A follow up on this and some new issues: <br>
<br>
1) I first tried Jörn's approach by creating my own BEM, always fun to <br>
make it yourself ;) However, I did not succeed since: <br>
a) the dipoli method does not work on Windows <br>
b) I downloaded the openmeeg toolbox, but got an error "om_minverser.exe <br>
has stopped working" I've emailed their buglist <br>
c) bemcp did run, but the result was not ok (see attachement). I also <br>
got the warning "% Warning: Matrix is singular, close to singular or <br>
badly scaled. Results may be inaccurate." several times, so that might <br>
be the problem. <br>
d) and asa gave the following error: % Error using ft_prepare_headmodel <br>
(line 201) % You must supply a valid cfg.hdmfile for use with ASA headmodel <br>
<br>
And away went my determination to do it myself, so I continued using <br>
thestandard_bem.mat <br>
<a href="http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/template/headmodel?s%5b%5d=standard&s%5b%5d=bem"><http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/template/headmodel?s[]=standard&s[]=bem></a>.
<br>
(I did not know this existed, I've added this link to note in the <br>
headmodel tutorial <br>
<a href="http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/tutorial/headmodel_eeg?&#background"><http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/tutorial/headmodel_eeg?&#background></a> to
<br>
make it easier to find, thanks Tzvetan for pointing this out!). <br>
<br>
2) This worked and after some fiddling to get the electrodes aligned it <br>
looks okay (see attached). <br>
However, as you can see in the figures, I have several very low <br>
electrodes, that are lower than the skin mesh. So I was wondering if <br>
this is a problem? Since for accurate calculation of how the currents <br>
flow from these low electrodes, I assume one needs the skin to go till <br>
there? What happens when I have electrodes floating in thin air? <br>
*So my question is:* <br>
a) will this cause great inaccuracies? <br>
b) if so, how can I extend the skin to go lower? The template MRI only <br>
goes that far to the bottom... Trick anyone? <br>
<br>
Thanks again, <br>
Ingrid <br>
<br>
<br>
On 4/9/2013 9:39 AM, Ingrid Nieuwenhuis wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks Jörn and Tzvetan for the scripts! I'll try it out and put it on
<br>
the wiki. <br>
Have a great day, <br>
Ingrid <br>
<br>
On 4/9/2013 12:32 AM, Tzvetan Popov wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Ingrid, <br>
<br>
in addition to Jorn's approach since you don't have MR and digitized <br>
elec position's you can load and realign the electrodes to the <br>
standard bem. Subsequently you can calculate the lead field and <br>
continue with your analysis pipeline. <br>
Good luck <br>
tzvetan <br>
%% read electrodes <br>
elec = ft_read_sens('/your <br>
path/fieldtrip-20130324/template/electrode/GSN-HydroCel-128.sfp'); <br>
%% read headmodel <br>
templateheadmodel = '/your <br>
path/fieldtrip-20130324/template/headmodel/standard_bem.mat'; <br>
load(templateheadmodel); <br>
%% electrode realign as good as possible <br>
% i.e. translate 0 -2 1.5 <br>
cfg=[]; <br>
cfg.method = 'interactive'; <br>
cfg.elec = elec; <br>
cfg.headshape = vol.bnd(1).pnt; <br>
elecR = ft_electroderealign(cfg); <br>
%% verify how the electrodes fit toghether with the brain volume <br>
cfg=[]; <br>
cfg.method = 'interactive'; <br>
cfg.elec = elecR; <br>
cfg.headshape = vol.bnd(3).pnt; <br>
elecR = ft_electroderealign(cfg); <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Ingrid, <br>
<br>
I just happen to done this a few weeks back, I changed things in the <br>
meanwhile, but I hope that the below steps are complete: <br>
/% read in the template MRI <br>
if isunix <br>
mri = <br>
ft_read_mri('/home/common/matlab/fieldtrip/external/spm8/templates/T1.nii'); <br>
elseif ispc <br>
mri = ft_read_mri(fullfile('M:', 'FieldTrip', 'trunk', 'external', <br>
'spm8', 'templates', 'T1.nii')); <br>
end <br>
<br>
<br>
% segment the MRI <br>
cfg = []; <br>
cfg.output = {'brain' 'skull' 'scalp'}; <br>
segmentedmri = ft_volumesegment(cfg, mris); <br>
<br>
<br>
% create the headmodel (BEM) <br>
cfg = []; <br>
%cfg.method ='openmeeg'; % TODO FIXME download openmeeg <br>
if isunix <br>
cfg.method ='dipoli'; % dipoli only works under linux <br>
else <br>
disp('TODO FIXME stick to dipoli for now or download openmeeg\n'); <br>
keyboard; <br>
end <br>
hdm = ft_prepare_headmodel(cfg, segmentedmri); <br>
<br>
elec = ft_read_sens('standard_1020.elc'); <br>
hdm = ft_convert_units(hdm, elec.unit); <br>
<br>
cfg = []; <br>
cfg.grid.xgrid = -125:8:125; <br>
cfg.grid.ygrid = -125:8:125; <br>
cfg.grid.zgrid = -125:8:125; <br>
cfg.grid.tight = 'yes'; <br>
cfg.grid.unit = hdm.unit; <br>
cfg.inwardshift = -1.5; <br>
cfg.vol = hdm; <br>
grid = ft_prepare_sourcemodel(cfg) <br>
grid = ft_convert_units(grid, elec.unit); <br>
<br>
figure; <br>
hold on; <br>
ft_plot_mesh(hdm.bnd(1), 'facecolor',[0.2 0.2 0.2], 'facealpha', <br>
0.3, 'edgecolor', [1 1 1], 'edgealpha', 0.05); <br>
ft_plot_mesh(grid.pos(grid.inside, :)); <br>
<br>
% this step is not necessary, cause you will see that everything is <br>
already aligned <br>
cfg = []; <br>
cfg.method = 'interactive'; <br>
cfg.elec = elec; <br>
cfg.headshape = hdm.bnd(1); <br>
tmp = ft_electroderealign(cfg); <br>
elec = tmp; % I had a bug here that I couldn't assign elec directly <br>
<br>
%% verify location of occipital electrodes <br>
<br>
occ_elec = elec; <br>
occ_chan = ft_channelselection({'O*', 'PO*', 'Cz*', 'Fz*'}, elec.label); <br>
occ_idx = match_str(elec.label, occ_chan); <br>
occ_elec.chanpos = occ_elec.chanpos(occ_idx, :); <br>
occ_elec.elecpos = occ_elec.elecpos(occ_idx, :); <br>
occ_elec.label = occ_elec.label(occ_idx, :); <br>
figure; <br>
ft_plot_sens(occ_elec) <br>
hold on; <br>
ft_plot_vol(ft_convert_units(hdm, elec.unit))/ <br>
<br>
<br>
Afair, that's all that is needed. Of course you need to adjust <br>
folder and file names. <br>
<br>
Greetings <br>
Jörn <br>
<br>
On 4/9/2013 2:04 AM, Ingrid Nieuwenhuis wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hi all, <br>
<br>
I'd like to do source analysis (loreta and or DICS) on my EEG data. <br>
I don't have anatomical MRIs and I don't have a measurement of the <br>
scalp surface. So I'd like to use a template MRI or a template head <br>
model that is located in the FieldTrip template directory. I have <br>
EGI (128 channels) data and electrode positions (not subject <br>
specific, just the standard file also available in FieldTrip <br>
electrode template, GSN-HydroCel-128.sfp), but I'm kind of stuck <br>
how to start. I don't see any examples on the FieldTrip page of how <br>
to make a headmodel and volume conduction model giving only this <br>
limited data. I'd be happy to make it into a example Matlab script <br>
on the FieldTrip page after I got it to work. Would someone be able <br>
to give me some pointers, or example code? <br>
<br>
Thanks a lot! <br>
Ingrid <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jörn M. Horschig <br>
PhD Student <br>
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour <br>
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging <br>
Radboud University Nijmegen <br>
Neuronal Oscillations Group <br>
FieldTrip Development Team <br>
<br>
P.O. Box 9101 <br>
NL-6500 HB Nijmegen <br>
The Netherlands <br>
<br>
Contact: <br>
<a href="mailto:E-Mail:jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl">E-Mail:jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl</a>
<br>
<a href="Tel:+31-(0)24-36-68493">Tel:+31-(0)24-36-68493</a> <br>
Web:<a href="http://www.ru.nl/donders">http://www.ru.nl/donders</a> <br>
<br>
Visiting address: <br>
Trigon, room 2.30 <br>
Kapittelweg 29 <br>
NL-6525 EN Nijmegen <br>
The Netherlands <br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
fieldtrip mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a> <a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">
<mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl></a> <br>
<a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
******************************************* <br>
Tzvetan Popov <br>
Clinical Psychology <br>
University of Konstanz <br>
Box 23 <br>
78457 Konstanz, GERMANY <br>
Phone: 0049-7531-883086 <br>
Fax: 0049-7531-884601 <br>
Email: <a href="mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de">tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de</a>
<br>
<a href="mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de"><mailto:tzvetan.popov@uni-konstanz.de></a>
<br>
******************************************* <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
fieldtrip mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a> <br>
<a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
-- <br>
Ingrid Nieuwenhuis PhD <br>
Postdoctoral Fellow <br>
Sleep and Neuroimaging Laboratory <br>
Department of Psychology <br>
University of California, Berkeley <br>
California 94720-1650 <br>
Tolman Hall, room 5305 <br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
fieldtrip mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a> <br>
<a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
-- <br>
Ingrid Nieuwenhuis PhD <br>
Postdoctoral Fellow <br>
Sleep and Neuroimaging Laboratory <br>
Department of Psychology <br>
University of California, Berkeley <br>
California 94720-1650 <br>
Tolman Hall, room 5305 <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
fieldtrip mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a> <br>
<a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________ <br>
fieldtrip mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a> <br>
<a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>fieldtrip mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>