<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Frederic,<br>
<br>
The one Google Code is the most recent version. My guess would be
that it was introduced beginning of July in revision 3807 (apologies
for that ). <br>
Any version after that had this bug, I cannot tell for the versions
before (but doubt).<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Jörn<br>
<br>
On 9/15/2011 4:07 PM, Frederic Roux wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:DUB113-W1326F423B7386BD431BD5DFB7070@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
<br>
Hi Jorn,<br>
<br>
I was wondering if the bug you reported concerning the
channel_repair<br>
function also applied to older versions of fieldtrip and in
which<br>
cases this bug appears.<br>
<br>
This would be important for me to know as I have been using the
function<br>
in the past and would like to know if it affects my results or
not.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Frederic<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Frédéric Roux, PhD student<br>
Department of Neurophysiology<br>
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research<br>
D-60529 Frankfurt am Main<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Frederic.Roux@brain.mpg.de">Frederic.Roux@brain.mpg.de</a><br>
+49(0)69630183225<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>> From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip-request@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip-request@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> Subject: fieldtrip Digest, Vol 10, Issue 18<br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:00:17 +0200<br>
> <br>
> Send fieldtrip mailing list submissions to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> <br>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip-request@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip-request@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> <br>
> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip-owner@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip-owner@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> <br>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
more specific<br>
> than "Re: Contents of fieldtrip digest..."<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Today's Topics:<br>
> <br>
> 1. Critical bug in ft_channelrepair fixed (J?rn M.
Horschig)<br>
> 2. Fwd: AW: Forward solution using concentric spheres and
BEM<br>
> models (Micheli, C.)<br>
> 3. cortical time-course reconstruction (Paolo
Belardinelli)<br>
> 4. Re: interaction within-subject indepsamplesT (Eric
Maris)<br>
> <br>
> <br>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> Message: 1<br>
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:41:45 +0200<br>
> From: "J?rn M. Horschig"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl"><jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> To: Email discussion list for the FieldTrip project<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl"><fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> Subject: [FieldTrip] Critical bug in ft_channelrepair
fixed<br>
> Message-ID: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:4E70AF19.2040003@donders.ru.nl"><4E70AF19.2040003@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed<br>
> <br>
> Hey everyone,<br>
> <br>
> we found a critical bug in ft_channelrepair, which we
fixed now. The bug <br>
> caused wrong channels to be chosen for interpolation in
some situations, <br>
> meaning that the timecourse your repaired channel did not
make sense. <br>
> Please be aware of this, check your reconstructed
channels and re-run <br>
> your channel reconstruction if you are in doubt with the
newest <br>
> FieldTrip version!<br>
> <br>
> For more information, check Google code:<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://code.google.com/p/fieldtrip/source/detail?r=4158">http://code.google.com/p/fieldtrip/source/detail?r=4158</a><br>
> and Bugzilla:<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugzilla.fcdonders.nl/show_bug.cgi?id=941">http://bugzilla.fcdonders.nl/show_bug.cgi?id=941</a><br>
> <br>
> Best regards,<br>
> J?rn<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> J?rn M. Horschig<br>
> PhD Student<br>
> Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour<br>
> Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging<br>
> Radboud University Nijmegen<br>
> Neuronal Oscillations Group<br>
> <br>
> P.O. Box 9101<br>
> NL-6500 HB Nijmegen<br>
> The Netherlands<br>
> <br>
> Contact:<br>
> E-Mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl">jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> Tel: +31-(0)24-36-68493<br>
> Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ru.nl/donders">http://www.ru.nl/donders</a><br>
> <br>
> Visiting address:<br>
> Trigon, room 2.30<br>
> Kapittelweg 29<br>
> NL-6525 EN Nijmegen<br>
> The Netherlands<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> Message: 2<br>
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:56:38 +0200 (CEST)<br>
> From: "Micheli, C." <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl"><c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl></a><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> Subject: [FieldTrip] Fwd: AW: Forward solution using
concentric<br>
> spheres and BEM models<br>
> Message-ID:<br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:1624476173.1270054.1316015798685.JavaMail.root@draco.zimbra.ru.nl"><1624476173.1270054.1316015798685.JavaMail.root@draco.zimbra.ru.nl></a><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8<br>
> <br>
> Hi Margit and Juan Pablo<br>
> see my answers below.<br>
> <br>
> ----- "Margit Sch?nherr"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Margit.Schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de"><Margit.Schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de></a> schreef:<br>
> <br>
> > Van: "Margit Sch?nherr"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Margit.Schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de"><Margit.Schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de></a><br>
> > Aan: "c micheli" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl"><c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl></a><br>
> > Verzonden: Woensdag 7 september 2011 09:33:53<br>
> > Onderwerp: AW: [FieldTrip] Forward solution using
concentric spheres and BEM models<br>
> ><br>
> > Hello Cristiano,<br>
> > <br>
> > thank you for your email. I have tried the code, but
I have 2 problems<br>
> > with it.<br>
> > 1) When I do it exactly as suggested in the email, I
get the following<br>
> > error when using ft_prepare_mesh:<br>
> > <br>
> > bnd = ft_prepare_mesh(cfg, mri_segment);<br>
> > ??? Error using ==> ft_prepare_mesh at 159<br>
> > unsupported cfg.method and/or input<br>
> > <br>
> > I think, this is simply a problem concerning the
naming of the<br>
> > variables. The segmented mri is called 'seg', the
labels are assigned<br>
> > to 'mri_segment'. I think, this is the wrong input
for<br>
> > ft_prepare_mesh, because 'mri_segment' does not
contain any mri<br>
> > information. Putting the labels into a new field
'seg.seg' and calling<br>
> > bnd = ft_prepare_mesh(cfg, seg) solves this.<br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> I could replicate the error and this is due to the fact
that ft_prepare_mesh accepts inputs of FieldTrip type
'volume'. See ft_datatype_volume. The function crashed because
I simply used an old version of the test file where I inputted
the volume matrix only, whereas three fields are required
(dim, transform and anatomy), that's why the input should look
like this:<br>
> <br>
> mri2 = [];<br>
> mri2.anatomy = mri_segment;<br>
> mri2.dim = mri.dim;<br>
> mri2.transform = mri.transform;<br>
> <br>
> I patched the correct code at the end of the mail.<br>
> <br>
> > 2) However, there is still only one surface
triangulated. So as I<br>
> > wrote in my last email, I still believe that line 25
in<br>
> > prepare_mesh_segmentation needs to be commented.
What do you mean?<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> I agree. This function needs a general review altogether
and at the moment I committed your correction. In the future
I'll restructure the whole function taking care of the more
recent guidelines. Thanks for your suggestion.<br>
> <br>
> Try this:<br>
> <br>
> % download from the FieldTrip ftp site <br>
> %
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="ftp://ftp.fcdonders.nl/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/Subject01.zip">ftp://ftp.fcdonders.nl/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/Subject01.zip</a>)<br>
> <br>
> % load the MRI<br>
> mri = ft_read_mri('Subject01.mri');<br>
> <br>
> % segment it<br>
> cfg = [];<br>
> cfg.output = {'scalp', 'skull', 'brain'};<br>
> seg = ft_volumesegment(cfg, mri);<br>
> <br>
> % volumetric preprocessing<br>
> % Note: the three compartments have to be 'filled'
otherwise the triangulation won't work correctly. The output
of ft_volumesegment will change soon, making it compatible
with ft_prepare_mesh. As of today we need the following:<br>
> <br>
> mri_segment{1} = seg.scalp;<br>
> mri_segment{2} = imfill(seg.skull,'holes'); % you need
the image processing toolbox here!<br>
> mri_segment{3} = seg.brain;<br>
> <br>
> % triangulation (from volumes to surfaces)<br>
> % Note: now the volumes are inputted one at a time<br>
> mri2 = mri;<br>
> cfg=[];<br>
> cfg.sourceunits = 'mm';<br>
> cfg.mrinuits = 'mm';<br>
> cfg.tissue = 1;<br>
> cfg.numvertices = 1000;<br>
> for i=1:3<br>
> mri2.seg = mri_segment{i};<br>
> mesh{i} = ft_prepare_mesh(cfg,mri2);<br>
> end<br>
> <br>
> % visualization of the triangulated surfaces<br>
>
figure,ft_plot_mesh(mesh{1},'edgecolor','none','facecolor','w','facealpha',0.5)<br>
>
ft_plot_mesh(mesh{2},'edgecolor','none','facecolor','g','facealpha',0.7)<br>
>
ft_plot_mesh(mesh{3},'edgecolor','none','facecolor','r','facealpha',1)<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> > Thank you.<br>
> <br>
> Be my guest.<br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Cristiano<br>
> <br>
> > <br>
> > Best regards,<br>
> > Margit<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > ***********************************<br>
> > Margit Sch?nherr<br>
> > Universit?tsklinikum Erlangen<br>
> > Neurologische Klinik<br>
> > Epilepsiezentrum (Biomagnetismus)<br>
> > Schwabachanlage 6<br>
> > 91054 Erlangen<br>
> > Telefon: ++49 9131 / 85 36921<br>
> > Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:margit.schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de">margit.schoenherr@uk-erlangen.de</a><br>
> > ***********************************<br>
> > ________________________________________<br>
> > Von: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip-bounces@donders.ru.nl</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip-bounces@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip-bounces@donders.ru.nl</a>]<br>
> > im Auftrag von Micheli, C.
[<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl">c.micheli@fcdonders.ru.nl</a>]<br>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2011 12:59<br>
> > An: Email discussion list for the FieldTrip project<br>
> > Betreff: Re: [FieldTrip] Forward solution using
concentric spheres <br>
> > and BEM models<br>
> > <br>
> > Dear Juan Pablo and Margit<br>
> > <br>
> > The function 'ft_prepare_mesh' takes care of
triangulating every<br>
> > compartment via the cfg.tissue option. This option
contains the<br>
> > integers which describe a type of tissue, given that
the user<br>
> > beforehand defined all voxels of the segmented MRI
compartment as<br>
> > having that particular value.<br>
> > As an example, download the sample MRI in FieldTrip
ftp location:<br>
> > <br>
> >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="ftp://ftp.fcdonders.nl/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/Subject01.zip">ftp://ftp.fcdonders.nl/pub/fieldtrip/tutorial/Subject01.zip</a><br>
> > Create a folder and unzip these files.<br>
> > <br>
> > % read in the mri<br>
> > mri = ft_read_mri('Subject01.mri');<br>
> > <br>
> > % segment it<br>
> > cfg = [];<br>
> > cfg.output = {'scalp', 'skull', 'brain'};<br>
> > seg = ft_volumesegment(cfg, mri);<br>
> > <br>
> > % assign a label<br>
> > scalp = (seg.scalp) & ~(seg.skull | seg.brain);<br>
> > skull = 2*(seg.skull);<br>
> > brain = 3*(seg.brain);<br>
> > mri_segment = scalp + skull + brain;<br>
> > <br>
> > % build the meshes<br>
> > cfg = [];<br>
> > cfg.method = 'segmentation';<br>
> > cfg.tissue = [1 2 3]; % scalp = 1; skull = 2; brain
= 3;<br>
> > cfg.numvertices = [2000 1000 800];<br>
> > cfg.sourceunits = 'mm';<br>
> > cfg.mriunits = 'mm';<br>
> > bnd = ft_prepare_mesh(cfg, mri_segment);<br>
> > <br>
> > If any of the tissues has a different value from
cfg.tissues this<br>
> > won't be triangulated. To check for this use
ft_sourceplot in the<br>
> > interactive mode. By clicking around you can see the
tissue's value in<br>
> > the command window:<br>
> > <br>
> > % view the labelled segmentations<br>
> > mri2 = mri;<br>
> > mri2.seg = mri_segment;<br>
> > cfg=[];<br>
> > cfg.interactive = 'yes';<br>
> > cfg.funparameter = 'seg';<br>
> > ft_sourceplot(cfg,mri2);<br>
> > <br>
> > About the concentric spheres:<br>
> > both ways to derive a concentric spheres model are
correct. In one<br>
> > case you directly build the vol structure and you
assume you know the<br>
> > radiuses of your spheres. In the other case you
allow the<br>
> > ft_prepare_concentricspheres function to build the
spheres starting<br>
> > from realistic geometrical boundaries.<br>
> > The second approach is my favorite because the
ft_prepare function<br>
> > contains a function that fits a sphere to each
boundary and I don't<br>
> > have to do it myself.<br>
> > The first approach (directly force the radiuses in
your vol structure)<br>
> > is preferable if you derive the information from
other software (e.g.<br>
> > CTF's MRIView) or if you fit the sphere yourself.<br>
> > <br>
> > @Pablo<br>
> > If the sphere is fitted inside the brain it is
correct. You do not<br>
> > want the sphere to include other tissues, because
your assumption for<br>
> > the construction of the forward model is that the
tissue inside the<br>
> > sphere is homogeneous.<br>
> > For a more realistic model (encompassing the whole
brain volume) I<br>
> > would rather use a BEM model.<br>
> > <br>
> > I hope this helps,<br>
> > Cristiano<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> Message: 3<br>
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:18:36 +0200<br>
> From: Paolo Belardinelli
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:paolo.belardinelli@med.uni-tuebingen.de"><paolo.belardinelli@med.uni-tuebingen.de></a><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> Subject: [FieldTrip] cortical time-course reconstruction<br>
> Message-ID: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:4E70D3DC.4060403@med.uni-tuebingen.de"><4E70D3DC.4060403@med.uni-tuebingen.de></a><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed<br>
> <br>
> Hi Robert.<br>
> We have some nice coherence maps with peaks in M1 for a
finger tapping <br>
> task. We were wondering how to properly reconstruct the
power <br>
> time-course in the M1 area in order to use it as a
further reference<br>
> signal.<br>
> <br>
> -Is the code necessary for the approach described in
(Schoffelen et al., <br>
> NeuroImage 2008) already implemented in ft (we observed
in the code that <br>
> it is possible in ft_sourceanalysis.m to give a location
for a<br>
> reference dipole but we found no documentation)?<br>
> <br>
> -Is the only reliable solution for reconstructing a
time-course to <br>
> project the activity in the dominant direction? We have
the eigenvalues <br>
> of the first dipole which are normally 3 to 6 times
larger<br>
> than the ones of the second. We are not sure this is
enough to neglect <br>
> the second component.<br>
> <br>
> - One last technical question: in the mailing list it is
said that the <br>
> orientation of the dipole is saved in source.avg.ori but
it doesn't seem <br>
> like that to us. Maybe we are doing something wrong.<br>
> <br>
> Best regards and thank you for your work,<br>
> <br>
> Paolo and Erick<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> Message: 4<br>
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:10:36 +0200<br>
> From: "Eric Maris" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:e.maris@donders.ru.nl"><e.maris@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> To: "'Email discussion list for the FieldTrip project'"<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl"><fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> Subject: Re: [FieldTrip] interaction within-subject
indepsamplesT<br>
> Message-ID:
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:008d01cc737e$f6192ba0$e24b82e0$@maris@donders.ru.nl"><008d01cc737e$f6192ba0$e24b82e0$@maris@donders.ru.nl></a><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
> <br>
> Dear Kathrin,<br>
> <br>
> > I need your advice on how to correctly test the
interaction effects in a<br>
> 2x2<br>
> > within-subject design with cluster-based
randomization tests. I have two<br>
> > factors A and B with the levels a1/a2 and b1/b2. In
addition, the number<br>
> of<br>
> > trials in A are about twice as much as in B.<br>
> > <br>
> > The procedure would be totally clear in a
between-subject design (as in a<br>
> > previous post on the list:<br>
> >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2011-January/003447.html">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/pipermail/fieldtrip/2011-January/003447.html</a>)<br>
> <br>
> This post is about a WITHIN-subjects design.<br>
> <br>
> > because I could easily compute the differences of
the factor levels<br>
> > A_diff=a1-a2 and B_diff=b1-b2 and then run
ft_freqstatistics on the<br>
> > differences. However, since I have to run the
statistics across trials and<br>
> not<br>
> > subjects I have independent samples and not
dependent samples. <br>
> <br>
> So, you have a between-trials design.<br>
> <br>
> If it is<br>
> > possible at all, how can I calculate the differences
A_diff and B_diff<br>
> across<br>
> > trials? Is it a problem that the number of trials
are not equal?<br>
> <br>
> This is not possible. Permutation tests cannot be used
for testing<br>
> interactions in a multi-factorial between-subjects/trials
design. Michael<br>
> Wibral has a post in which he refers to a nice statistics
paper on the<br>
> issue.<br>
> <br>
> A proxy that is possible (but not statistically sound) is
to perform two<br>
> statistical tests of the first factor, once at the first
level of second<br>
> factor and once at the second level.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Best,<br>
> <br>
> Eric Maris<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> > <br>
> > Any help is appreciated!<br>
> > <br>
> > Best,<br>
> > Kathrin<br>
> > <br>
> > _____________________________________<br>
> > Kathrin M?sch<br>
> > <br>
> > Dept. of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology<br>
> > University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf<br>
> > Martinistr. 52<br>
> > 20246 Hamburg<br>
> > Germany<br>
> > Phone: +49-40-7410-54680<br>
> > Fax: +49-40-7410-57752<br>
> > E-Mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:k.muesch@uke.uni-hamburg.de">k.muesch@uke.uni-hamburg.de</a><br>
> > _____________________________________<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > --<br>
> > Pflichtangaben gem?? Gesetz ?ber elektronische
Handelsregister und<br>
> > Genossenschaftsregister sowie das
Unternehmensregister (EHUG):<br>
> > <br>
> > Universit?tsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; K?rperschaft
des ?ffentlichen<br>
> > Rechts; Gerichtsstand: Hamburg<br>
> > <br>
> > Vorstandsmitglieder: Prof. Dr. J?rg F. Debatin
(Vorsitzender), Dr.<br>
> Alexander<br>
> > Kirstein, Joachim Pr?l?, Prof. Dr. Dr. Uwe
Koch-Gromus<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > fieldtrip mailing list<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> >
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> fieldtrip mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br>
> <br>
> End of fieldtrip Digest, Vol 10, Issue 18<br>
> *****************************************<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
fieldtrip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Jörn M. Horschig
PhD Student
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
Radboud University Nijmegen
Neuronal Oscillations Group
P.O. Box 9101
NL-6500 HB Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact:
E-Mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl">jm.horschig@donders.ru.nl</a>
Tel: +31-(0)24-36-68493
Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ru.nl/donders">http://www.ru.nl/donders</a>
Visiting address:
Trigon, room 2.30
Kapittelweg 29
NL-6525 EN Nijmegen
The Netherlands</pre>
</body>
</html>