<html>
<head>
</head>
<body style="margin-right: 4px; margin-left: 4px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; margin-top: 4px">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">Dear Olga and Gopa,</font> </p>
<br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">I would like to comment on this discussion because I fear that there could be some misunderstandings.</font> </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">Unlike t, the F statistic is not sensitive to the direction of a difference. The t value gets positive if means of group A > group B, and negative if B > A. Therefore, the hypothesis that A >< B can be tested on both tails of the t distribution. On contrast, the F value gets positive if A > B as well as if B > A. Small values of F, on the left tail of the distribition, indicate that there is no difference between means of A and B. This is why a left tail or a two-tailed test does not make sense with an F-Test. </font> </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">So Olga, if you have a two-group design, and if you want to apply a left- or two-tailed test, then use the t statistic. Beware that the two-sided test is usually considered more (not less) conservative that the one-sided test. This is because the critical value of t increases for two-sided tests. It is the size if the rejection region for H0 that needs to be halved, not the one-sided critical value of your test statistic. For example, a result of t(20)= 1.9 is significant in a one-tail right-sided test where it exceeds the critical value of 1.72 (the 0.95 quantile of a t distribution with 20 df). But it is not significant in a two sided test where the critical values are 2.09 (0.975 quantile) and -2.09 (0.025 quantile).</font> </p>
<br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">Best regards,</font> </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<font size="2" face="Dialog">Gregor</font> </p>
<br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<br>
<br>
<font face="Dialog" STYLE="font-size: 10pt"><br>--
<BR>Dr. rer. nat. Gregor Volberg <gregor.volberg@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de> ( mailto:gregor.volberg@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de )
<BR>University of Regensburg
<BR>Institute for Experimental Psychology
<BR>93040 Regensburg, Germany
<BR>Tel: +49 941 943 3862
<BR>Fax: +49 941 943 3233
<BR><a href="http://www.psychologie.uni-regensburg.de/Greenlee/team/volberg/volberg.html
">http://www.psychologie.uni-regensburg.de/Greenlee/team/volberg/volberg.html
</a><BR><br><br></font>>>> Gopakumar Venugopalan <venug001@crimson.ua.edu> 9/1/2011 6:58 PM >>><br> </p>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
Dear Olga, this does not mean only right tail is possible. You could have a positive or negative sign for your test statistic, which is acceptable. That can be fixed in Fieldtrip or EEGLAB by the order you enter Condition1 and Condition 2. But to answer your question more substantively: </p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
A one-tail test is more consevervative than a two-tail test. A two-tail test is when you have no a priori expectation where you expect the condition 1 - condition 2 to be higher or lower. Using a non EEG example if you have two groups treatment and control, you will expect yoga to lower the depression rates in treatment group and not the control group. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
Similarly if you have two groups treatment and control, you will expect some protein shake to yield higher muscle mass in the treatment group and not the control group. In both cases the outcome (negative or lower in scenario one, higher or positive on scenario two) is an a priori expectation. So in a EEG sense we know that the Incongruent or deviant word will have a higher displacement than the congruent or expected word.. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
Going back to the conservative versus liberal nature of the statistic. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
If the tabled value of the F (df1=1, df2=11) is 4.84 that is the size of the tail or the reject region, however when you halve that you tabled value is half of it. So you obtained value in the first case would have to be greater than 4.85, while in the two-tail case it slide with anything over 2.43. Therefore the two-tail is not only for exploratory purposes, but is also less conservative. </p>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
I hope I have helped. </p>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
Warm regards </p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
gopa<br><br> </p>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Sysoeva, Olga Vladimirovna <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysoevao@psychiatry.wustl.edu">sysoevao@psychiatry.wustl.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br> </p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 0; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0; border-left: #ccc 1px solid; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px" class="gmail_quote">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Dear Fieldtrippers, </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
I’ve tried to use between subject ANOVA (independentF) and a bit confused with the tails. </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
I’ve got the following message </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
“For an independent samples F-statistic, it does not make sense to calculate a two-sided critical value.” </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Could you explain me why? Why only right tail is possible? </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Best Regards, </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Olga. </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
____________________________________________________________________________ </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Olga Sysoeva, </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Research Associate, PhD </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Psychiatry Department, </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Washington University School of Medicine </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Campus Box 8134 </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
660 South Euclid Ave </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0" class="MsoNormal">
Saint Louis, MO 63110-9909 </p>
<br>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<br>
<hr>
<font size="1" color="gray" face="Arial">The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.<br style="color: gray; font-size: 1; font-family: Arial"></font> </p>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>fieldtrip mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl">fieldtrip@donders.ru.nl</a><br><a target="_blank" href="http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip">http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/fieldtrip</a><br> </p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 0">
<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>