Spam detection software, running on the system "brievenbus.science.ru.nl", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
postmaster@science.ru.nl for details.

Content preview:  Dear Dr Eric Maris and members of Fieldtrip mailing list At
   first, I'm sorry for my poor English. I'm a post-doc research fellow of Department
   of Neuropsychiatry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. I'm studying about
   auditory abnormalities in mental disorders, for example, schizophrenia, bipolar
   disorder, using MEG. I'm very impressed and interested in Dr Eric Maris and
   Dr Robert Oostenveld paper, "Nonparametrical statistical testing of EEG and
   MEG data, on Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007". I'd like to apply their
   stastical methods to our data, but there are some points that I can't understand
   in their paper. Those are about cluster-based statistics. In the right column
   in page 180 in their paper, they wrote 5 steps of statistics methods. At
  5th step, they take the largest of the cluster- level statistics, then how
   do they test this largest of the cluster- level statistics? I thought that,
   after 5th step, I should make the permutation distribution of cluster-level
   statistics of selected cluster, and I should test the given cluster-level
   statistics with this permutation distribution. Is this right? Any answer
  will help me. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (9.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 3.9 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
 3.2 CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER A foreign language charset used in headers
 2.7 FM_FRM_RN_L_BRACK      From name has > but not <