Open Source Clean?

[Anton Moscal]

> Now, that's not to say that distributing the source code is a bad thing.
> Personally, I'd prefer it if they do. *Especially* if they distribute the
> Clean code that they use in the compiler and stuff. In general I'm more
> interested in seeing an extensible compiler/parser (a la Cardelli) than
> that, however.

But for this we need open binary format for Clean Abstract Syntax Tree
(as existing for the Objective Caml (see CamlP4 "preprocessor"")).

Anton